Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1923/2026 of DEEPALI RAVI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 16 June 2026
GAHC010113222026 2026:GAU-AS:8698 DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1923/2026 DEEPALI RAVI W/O- SRI RANJIT DUTTA, R/O- MARGHERITA TOWN, A.T.T. MILL COLONY, P.S. MARGHERITA, P.O. MAKUMPATHER, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-
GAHC010113222026
2026:GAU-AS:8698 DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1923/2026
DEEPALI RAVI
W/O- SRI RANJIT DUTTA, R/O- MARGHERITA TOWN, A.T.T. MILL COLONY, P.S. MARGHERITA, P.O. MAKUMPATHER, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-
78687.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:THE SECRETARY JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DISPUR.
4:DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
TINSUKIA.
5:THE SECRETARY
MARGHERITA BAR ASSOCIATION
MARGHERITA
DIST. TINSUKIA
ASSAM
PIN- 786181.
6:SMT. RUPA PAGBONDHA
W/O- SRI JULLIUS CHETIA
R/O- KUSHAL NAGAR CHARIALI
MARGHERITA
P.O. AND P.S. MARGHERITA
DIST. TINSUKIA
PIN- 786181.
7:SMT. LAXMI THAPA PRADHAN
W/O- SRI BASAN PRADHAN
P.O. BORGOLAI
NEAR ADARSH HINDI HIGH SCHOOL
P.S. MARGHERITA
DIST. TINSUKIA
PIN- 786181.
8:JANKI DEVI THAPA
W/O- SRI DHIRAJ THAPA
NO. 1 BORBIL JYOTI NAGAR
DIGBOI
P.O. AND P.S. DIGBOI
DIST. TINSUKIA
PIN- 786171.
9:SOUMIK DAS GUPTA
S/O- LATE KAJAL DAS GUPTA
MISSION PARA
NEAR HARIOM MANDIR
P.O. AND P.S. DIGBOI
DIST. TINSUKIA
ASSAM
PIN- 786171.
10:GAUHATI HIGH COURT
REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR GENERAL
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K DEY, MR V K BAROOAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, GHC
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.06.2026 (A.D.Choudhury, J).
1. We have heard Mr. V. K. Barooah, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant seeking striking out the names of the respondent No. 7 and respondent No. 10, from the array of respondents in the connected WP(C) No. 1423/2024.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no adverse or necessary interest involved against the respondent No. 7 and respondent No. 10 in the connected writ petition and accordingly, seeks leave of this Court to strike out the names of the respondent No. 7 and respondent No. 10 from the array of respondents in the connected writ petition.
4. Perused the averments made in the application as well as the materials available on record.
5. Considering the averments made in the application, the prayer of the applicant is allowed, however, at the risk of the applicant.
6. The applicant to furnish fresh memo of parties before the Registry within a period of one week from today and thereafter, Registry to do the needful for striking out the names of the respondent Nos. 7 and respondent No. 10 from the cause title of the connected writ petition as well as from CIS.
7. This Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant