Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2210/2022 of PRADIP MEDHI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 16 June 2026
GAHC010060882022 2026:GAU-AS:8740 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2210/2022 PRADIP MEDHI S/O- LATE PRABHAT CH. MEDHI, R/O- GMC HOUSE NO. 11, 2ND FLOOR, K.C CHOUDHARY ROAD, 2ND BYE LANE, CHATRIBARI, GUWAHATI-08, DIST- KAMRUP
GAHC010060882022
2026:GAU-AS:8740
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2210/2022
PRADIP MEDHI
S/O- LATE PRABHAT CH. MEDHI,
R/O- GMC HOUSE NO. 11, 2ND FLOOR,
K.C CHOUDHARY ROAD, 2ND BYE LANE, CHATRIBARI, GUWAHATI-08,
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT, ASSAM SECRETARIAT (C), DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, DIST-KAMRUP(M), ASSAM
2:THE GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
PAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-1
DIST-KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
3:THE COMMISSIONER
THE GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
PAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-1
DIST-KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
4:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
STATFED BUILDING
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-5
DIST-KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
STATEFED BUILDING
BHANGAGARH
GMCH ROAD
GUWAHATI-05
6:PRANAB KUMAR MEDHI
S/O- LATE PRABHAT CH. MEDHI
R/O- GMC HOUSE NO. 11
1ST FLOOR
K.C CHOUDHARY ROAD
2ND BYE LANE
CHATRIBARI
GUWAHATI-08
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
7:PRATIMA BORA
W/O- LATE KRISHNA SANKAR BORA
R/O- GMC HOUSE NO. 11
GROUND FLOOR
K.C CHOUDHARY ROAD
2ND BYE LANE
CHATRIBARI
GUWAHATI-08
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSA
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. P. Mandal, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : XXXX
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
17.06.2026
Mr. D. P. Mandal, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant