Gauhati High Court
WA/106/2026 of SRI BIPUL RABHA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 16 June 2026
GAHC010021492026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/106/2026 SRI BIPUL RABHA SON OF LATE PHANINDRA CHANDRA RABHA, R/O BHALUKDUBI, P.O BHALUKDUBI, P.S GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN - 783101. VERSUS 1: THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010021492026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/106/2026 SRI BIPUL RABHA SON OF LATE PHANINDRA CHANDRA RABHA, R/O BHALUKDUBI, P.O BHALUKDUBI, P.S GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN - 783101. VERSUS 1: THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY VETERINARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06 2:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE ON COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT (SLC) REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GHY- 06. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPT CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI- 03. ASSAM 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER GOALPARA DISTRICT GOALPARA - 783101 5:THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER GOALPARA PIN 783101 For the Appellant(s) : None. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. J.K. Goswami, Standing Counsel, Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Department.
Page No.# 2/2
– B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 17.06.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) None appears for the appellant on call. Mr. J.K. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Department, however, is present. It appears that the appellant has lost interest in this litigation. On the last occasion also, nobody had appeared for him. In view of the above, the writ appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant