Gauhati High Court
FAO/37/2026 of BAKUL DAS AND 2 ORS. Vs SADHAN DAS AND 5 ORS. on 16 June 2026
GAHC010120852026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : FAO/37/2026 BAKUL DAS AND 2 ORS. SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS, RESIDENT OF NALAPARA, SAWKUCHI, SAUKUCHI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2: ABHIJIT DAS SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS RESIDENT OF NALAPARA
GAHC010120852026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : FAO/37/2026
BAKUL DAS AND 2 ORS.
SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS, RESIDENT OF NALAPARA, SAWKUCHI, SAUKUCHI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
2: ABHIJIT DAS
SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS
RESIDENT OF NALAPARA
SAWKUCHI
SAUKUCHI
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
3: TUTU DAS
SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS
RESIDENT OF NALAPARA
SAWKUCHI
SAUKUCHI
KAMRUP (M)
ASSA
VERSUS
SADHAN DAS AND 5 ORS.
SON OF LATE RATHINDRA KUMAR DAS, RESIDENT OF VAISALI HOUSING
SOCIETY OF CO. OPERATIVE, FLAT NO. B-2, SANTIRAM DAS PATH, RIHABARI, GUWAHATI-08, DISTRICT-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781008.
2:SANJIT RAM PHUKAN
SON OF LATE AMIYA RAM PHUKAN
RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. D-2
MANDOVI APARTMENT
AMBARI
G.N.B. ROAD
KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI- 781001.
3:RANJIT RAM PHUKAN @ RANJIT PHUKAN
SON OF LATE AMIYA RAM PHUKAN
RESIDENT OF 4848 LOWREY ROAD
DAKLAND
C-94605
USA. REPRESENTED BY HIS ATTORNEY HOLDER
SRI SANJIT RAM PHUKAN
4:SMTI. NIRUPAMA DAS
WIFE OF BHABEN DAS
RESIDENT OF BETKUCHI
LOKHARA
NEAR LOKHARA CHARIALI
LOKHARA- REHABARI ROAD
P.O.- SAWKUCHI
GUWAHATI-40
DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
5:ANUP KUMAR AGARWALA
SON OF SRI MEGHRAJ AGARWALA
R/O UNIQUE HEIGHTS
RUKMINI NAGAR
S.K. BARUAH ROAD
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781006
6:MANISH AGARWALA
SON OF SRI MEGHRAJ AGARWALA
R/O UNIQUE HEIGHTS
RUKMINI NAGAR
S.K. BARUAH ROAD
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K SEN, N HASAN,MS. J PAUL,MS B MAHANTA
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.06.2026 Heard Mr. B. K. Sen, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Upon the issue of maintainability of the present FAO being pointed out by the Court, learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to avail such remedy as may be available in law. The prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellants to institute appropriate proceedings, if so advised and permissible in law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant