Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1182/2026 of KAPILANSH VYAPAAR PRIVATE LIMITED Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS on 16 June 2026
GAHC010016482026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1182/2026 KAPILANSH VYAPAAR PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ABHINANDAN BUILDING, H.S. ROAD,, CHATRIBARI, GUWAHATI THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010016482026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1182/2026
KAPILANSH VYAPAAR PRIVATE LIMITED
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ABHINANDAN BUILDING, H.S.
ROAD,, CHATRIBARI, GUWAHATI THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR VARUN KUMAR CHOUBISA , AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O
GHANSHYAM LAL CHOUBISA, R/O 16, SHRI KRISHNA VIHAR, KESHAV
NAGAR, GIRWA, UDAIPUR, RAJASTHAN- 313001
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ROOM NO. 46, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110001 THROUGH ITS REVENUE SECRETARY
2:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
AAYAKAR BHAWAN
CHRISTIAN BASTI
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI
ASSAM - 781005
3:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 2
AAYAKAR BHAWAN
CHRISTIAN BASTI
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI
ASSAM - 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SAURADEEP DEY, MR. A NAYAK
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, INCOME TAX, DY.S.G.I.
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17-06-2026 Heard Mr. P. Khurana, learned counsel through virtual mode with Mr. S. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. A.K. Dutta, learned CGC for the respondent no. 1; and Mr. S. Chetia, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department for the respondent nos. 2 – 4. Mr. Khurana has submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been mitigated and therefore, the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition at this stage, and wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to approach again, in the event any new cause of action arises. Mr. Dutta and Mr. Chetia have submitted that they have no objection to the prayer so made. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant