Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/7577/2016 of MD. MOFIZUL HOQUE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 15 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010227572016 2026:GAU-AS:8656 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7577/2016 MD. MOFIZUL HOQUE S/O. FAIZ UDDIN AHMED, R/O. VILL. TAPESWARA, P.O. BALAGAON, P.S. KALGACHIA, DIST. BARPETA, PIN. 781319, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF

GAHC010227572016

2026:GAU-AS:8656

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/7577/2016

MD. MOFIZUL HOQUE

S/O. FAIZ UDDIN AHMED, R/O. VILL. TAPESWARA, P.O. BALAGAON, P.S.

KALGACHIA, DIST. BARPETA, PIN. 781319, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF

ASSAM, EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPTT., GUWAHATI-6.

2:THE COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPTT.

3:THE DIRECTOR

DIRECTORATE OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-19

ASSAM.

4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

BARPETA

ASSAM.

5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

BARPETA DISTRICT CIRCLE BDC

BARPETA

PIN. 781319

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.T K BORA, MS. S BORO,MS. K MITRA,MR B PAUL,MR.B

GOGOI

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, SECONDARY EDUCATION

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 16.06.2026

Mr. U. Ghosh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the petitioner has unfortunately expired during the pendency of this writ petition.

Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department, by placing the communication dated 15.06.2026 from the Inspector of Schools, BDC, Barpeta, along with the Death Certificate of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has expired on 10.09.2023. He submits that the scheme under which the petitioner had made the claim has already been superseded and is no longer in operation.

Ms. K. Phukan, learned State Counsel, for respondent No. 4, is present.

In view of above, the issue raised in this writ petition no longer survives for adjudication.

Accordingly, writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead