Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/316/2026 of ABUB @ ABU AHMED MAZUMDAR Vs MUKESH KUMAR AND 2 ORS. on 14 June 2026
GAHC010118712026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/316/2026 ABUB @ ABU AHMED MAZUMDAR S/O MOHIBUR RAHMAN MAZUMDAR, R/O 08, ITKHOLA, BASGHAT, SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788002 VERSUS MUKESH KUMAR AND 2
GAHC010118712026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/316/2026
ABUB @ ABU AHMED MAZUMDAR
S/O MOHIBUR RAHMAN MAZUMDAR, R/O 08, ITKHOLA, BASGHAT, SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788002
VERSUS
MUKESH KUMAR AND 2 ORS.
BRANCH MANAGER, AU SMALL FINANCE BANK, LUNKARANSAR
BRANCH, SHOP NO. 152, NEW DHAN MANDI, LUNKARANSAR, DIST- BIKANER, RAJASTHAN, PIN- 334603
2:SARVPREET SINGH SAHNI
BRANCH MANAGER
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
PHASE NO. VII
MOHALI BRANCH
SCF 20
SAS NAGAR PHASE VII
DIST- MOHALI
PUNJAB
PIN- 160059
3:L RAVI SHANKAR
BRANCH MANAGER
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK
PAWAN PURI BRANCH
BIKANER
NO. BK9 PAWAN PURI
NEAR BIKANER NURSING HOME
DIST- BIKANER
RAJASTHAN
PIN- 33400
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY, J SARMAH,M N RONGMEI,MRS. R
RONGMEI
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15.06.2026
Heard Mr. P.K. Roychoudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. R. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Roychoudhury has submitted that in the Order dated 21.05.2026 [Annexure-18] passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cachar, Silchar in Silchar Police Station Case no. 366/2024, the learned court has observed that the conduct of the A.U. Small Finance Bank has amounted to contempt of the court. Meaning thereby, the respondents who are responsible in-charge and day-to-day conduct of the affairs of the concerned bank i.e. the A.U. Small Finance Bank would come under the purview of Section 10 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and they are liable thereunder. As it transpires that the copy of the Order dated 21.05.2026 has not been brought to the notice of the alleged contemnor and that the petitioner’s contemplated action to initiate proceeding under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are not brought to the notice of the Court, this contempt petition is closed, by granting liberty to the petitioner to bring the Order dated 21.05.2026 to the notice of the alleged contemnor along with contemplated action to be initiated by the petitioner under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 at first. The petitioner is granted liberty to file the contempt petition afresh thereupon, if the order dated 21.05.2026 is not adhered to by the alleged contemnors.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant