Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2372/2026 of THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S BUILDWORTH PVT LIMITED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 14 June 2026
GAHC010087992026 2026:GAU-AS:8566 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2372/2026 THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S BUILDWORTH PVT LIMITED G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI - 781005, ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF M/S BUILDWORTH PVT. LIMITED, MR.
GAHC010087992026
2026:GAU-AS:8566
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2372/2026
THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S BUILDWORTH PVT LIMITED
G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI - 781005, ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE
DIRECTOR OF M/S BUILDWORTH PVT. LIMITED, MR. DEEPAK SINGH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O LATE RAM NAGINA SINGH, RESIDENT OF
BUILDWORTH BUILDING, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI - 781005, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR WELFARE DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
781006.
2:THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER
ASSAM
SHRAM BHAVAN
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-781007.
3:THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
ASSAM
SHRAM BHAVAN
ULUBARI
781007.
4:BUILDWORTH SHRAMIK UNION
WORKERS COLONY
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI- 781005
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY
SRI. BASANTA KALITA
RESIDENT OF P.O. NIZBAHJANI
DISTRICT AND P.S.- NALBARI
PIN - 781334
ASSAM.
5:SRI BASANTA KALITA
RESIDENT OF P.O. NIZBAHJANI
DISTRICT AND P.S.- NALBARI
PIN - 781334
ASSAM AND ALSO OF WORKERS COLONY
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI- 781005
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Sarmah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15.06.2026
Heard Mr. R. Sarmah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in the meantime, the judgment and order dated 16.12.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 5866/2014 by this Court has been complied with by both the parties.
3. Considering the above, nothing further survives for consideration in the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed with the further observation that the parties to the instant writ petition shall be bound by the judgment and order dated 16.12.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 5866/2014.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant