Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1925/2026 of JAYANTA DOLEY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 11 June 2026
GAHC010104902026 2026:GAU-AS:8369 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1925/2026 JAYANTA DOLEY S/O- LOLSING DOLEY, R/OHOUSE NO.115, SUSHILA PATH,KAINADHARA, UDAYNAGAR,KHANAPARA, GUWATI-7810 22 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
GAHC010104902026
2026:GAU-AS:8369
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1925/2026 JAYANTA DOLEY S/O- LOLSING DOLEY, R/OHOUSE NO.115, SUSHILA PATH,KAINADHARA, UDAYNAGAR,KHANAPARA, GUWATI-7810 22 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OFASSAM FINANCE TAXATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI781006. 3:THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 4:THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE TAXATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 Advocate for the Petitioner : IMSENKALA, MR S DUTTA,MS M BORAH,MS. B CHOUDHURY,MR A CHOWDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR O R D E R 12.06.2026 (Nelson Sailo, J) Heard Mr. A. Chowdhury, learned senior counsel through remote video conferencing and he is assisted by Ms. M. Borah, learned counsel and Mr.Abhishek Roy, learned counsel also through remote video conferencing for the applicant.
2. By filing this application, the applicant seeks condonation of 24 (twenty four) days delay in filing the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 01.04.2026 passed in WP(C) No.6191/2024.
3. Referring to the application, learned senior counsel submits that the delay has occasioned on account of the liberty granted by the Court to the authorities concerned to review the suspension order and to pass orders within 45(forty five) days. The suspension order thereafter was reviewed on 06.05.2026 and therefore, since the same was awaited, there is delay in filing the connected appeal. The learned senior counsel submits that the applicant is mainly aggrieved with the observation made by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 139(xii) of the judgment and order under challenge. He therefore, submits that the delay in filing the connected appeal may be condoned.
4. Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that in view of the explanation tendered by the applicant, Court may consider the same and pass an appropriate order as it deems fit and proper.
5. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the statements made in the application, we find the explanation tendered to be sufficient for condonation of the delay.
6. Accordingly, the delay of 24 (twenty four) days in filing the connected appeal stands condoned.
7. Interlocutory application stands disposed of.
8. Registry shall now register the connected writ appeal and post the same for admission on 18.06.2026.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant