Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1968/2026 of MD NEKIB HUSSAIN Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 11 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010117222026 2026:GAU-AS:8426 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1968/2026 MD NEKIB HUSSAIN SON OF CHANDULLAH MIAH, RESIDENT OF VILL- KHARMUZA, P.O.- KHARMUZA, P.S. AND DISTRICT- GOALPARA, ASSAM 783101 VERSUS THE UNION

GAHC010117222026

2026:GAU-AS:8426

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1968/2026

MD NEKIB HUSSAIN

SON OF CHANDULLAH MIAH, RESIDENT OF VILL- KHARMUZA, P.O.- KHARMUZA, P.S. AND DISTRICT- GOALPARA, ASSAM 783101

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ROOM NO.66, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001.

2:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER

CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX

CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS

5TH FLOOR

GST BHAWAN

KEDAR ROAD

MACHKHOWA

GUWAHATI-781001

3:THE JURISDICTION OFFICER SUPERINTENDENT

CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE T

DHALIGAON RANGE

GOALPARA-2

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R S MISHRA, MS. M DEY,MS B SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, GST

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 12.06.2026

Heard Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. C. Keyal, learned Senior Counsel-cum-Standing Counsel, CGST, for the opposite parties.

This is an application praying for correction of the typographical error in the order dated 01.06.2026, passed in WP(C) No. 2789/2026.

The writ petition, being WP(C) No. 2789/2026, was disposed of on 01.06.2026, wherein the GST Registration Number of the petitioner has been wrongly mentioned as “18AFJPH3696G1Z6” instead of GST Registration No. “18AEJPH3696G1Z6”.

Having considered that the GST Registration Number of the petitioner has been wrongly mentioned as “18AFJPH3696G1Z6” in paragraph 2 of the order dated 01.06.2026, passed in WP(C) No. 2789/2026, I deem it appropriate to allow this interlocutory application.

Accordingly, the GST Registration Number recorded as “18AFJPH3696G1Z6” in paragraph 2 of the order dated 01.06.2026, passed in WP(C) No. 2789/2026, stands corrected as “18AEJPH3696G1Z6”.

This order shall form part of the order dated 01.06.2026 passed in WP(C) No. 2789/2026.

Interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead