Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/468/2026 of MS KAG ASSOCIATES Vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE on 11 June 2026
GAHC010092832026 2026:GAU-AS:8433 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/468/2026 MS KAG ASSOCIATES A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT- HOUSE NO. 69 SOUTH SARANIA P.O. AND P.S. ULUBARI DIST. KAMRUP METRO
GAHC010092832026
2026:GAU-AS:8433
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
I.A.(Civil)/468/2026
MS KAG ASSOCIATES
A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT- HOUSE NO. 69
SOUTH SARANIA
P.O. AND P.S. ULUBARI
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI
ASSAM-781007.
2: GUNAJIT GOGOI
AUTHORISED PARTNER OF M/S KAG ASSOCIATES
S/O- PULIN GOGOI
R/O- VILL- RUDRESWAR
NEAR MADAM MAFI MANDIR
P.O. RANGAMAHAL
P.S. CHANGSARI
DIST. KAMRUP
GUWAHATI
ASSAM-781030.
VERSUS
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
O/O THE SUPTD. OF POLICE
KAMRUP
DIST AMINGAON
PO AND PS AMINGAON
DIST KAMRUP ASSAM
2:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
NORTH GUWAHATI POLICE STATION
PO AND PS AMINGAON
DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781031
3:THE NORTH GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL BOARD
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
NORTH GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL BOARD OFFICE
NORTH GUWAHTAI
PO AMINGAON
DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM 781031
4:THE VICE CHAIRMAN
NORTH GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL BOARD OFFICE
NORTH GUWAHTAI
PO AMINGAON
DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM 781031
------------
Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. J Singh Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. Sheeladitya B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12.06.2026 Heard Mr. J Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant.
2. The writ petitioner submits that the petitioner do not want to implead the opposite parties of the present application as parties to the accompanying writ petition. He, therefore, submits that the petitioner would like to withdraw the instant application.
3. Accordingly the instant application stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE
Comparing Assistant