Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1861/2021 of MINAKSHI MECH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS on 11 June 2026
GAHC010050022021 2026:GAU-AS:8371 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1861/2021 MINAKSHI MECH D/O- SHRI GAUTAM MECH, R/O- SOUTH KALIHAMARI, P.O., P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
GAHC010050022021
2026:GAU-AS:8371
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1861/2021
MINAKSHI MECH
D/O- SHRI GAUTAM MECH, R/O- SOUTH KALIHAMARI, P.O., P.S. AND
DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786001
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT.OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF
SOCIAL WELFARE, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE
ASSAM
UZANBAZAR
GHY
ASSAM
PIN- 781001
3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
DIBRUGARH
DIST.- DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN- 786001
4:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER (D)
DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN- 786001
5:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER
DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN- 786003
6:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER (URBAN)
JIBON PHUKAN NAGAR
DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
DIBRUGARH
DIST.- DIBRUGARH
PIN- 786001
8:GITANJALI SONWAL
W/O- BIJAY SONWAL
R/O- SOUTH KALIHAMARI
CHURCH LANE
P.O.
P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN- 786001
9:RUPA KURMI MAHATO
D/O- LT. GANESH KURMI
R/O- GANDHI NAGAR
P.O. MILAN NAGAR
CHOWKIDINGHEE BRANCH
P.S. MILAN NAGAR
DIST.- DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PIN- 78600
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N N UPADHYAYA, MR. B B KAKATI,MR R DHAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. S J SARMAH (R-8,9),MR H BEZBARUA (R- 8,9),H Z SINGHA (R-8)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.06.2026 Heard Mr. S. Upadhyaya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bora, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Mr. S. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has received instructions from the client not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly seeks withdrawal of the same. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter stands dismissed on being withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant