Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/715/2022 of DILIP KUMAR TALUKDAR AND 4 ORS Vs DR. BIJOYA CHUODHURY AND 2 ORS on 11 June 2026
GAHC010246392022 2026:GAU-AS:8359 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/715/2022 DILIP KUMAR TALUKDAR AND 4 ORS S/O. LT. HARISH CHANDRA TALUKDAR, VILL. DAKHIN NAKHETRI, P.O. KARIA, P.S. NALBARI, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM,
GAHC010246392022
2026:GAU-AS:8359
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/715/2022
DILIP KUMAR TALUKDAR AND 4 ORS
S/O. LT. HARISH CHANDRA TALUKDAR, VILL. DAKHIN NAKHETRI, P.O.
KARIA, P.S. NALBARI, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN-781339.
2: ARATI DAS
W/O. LT. MAHENDRA DAS
VILL. KATHAL GHOPA
P.S. HAJO
DIST. KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781339.
3: ALTAF HUSSAIN
S/O. LT. SAMSUL HOQUE
VILL. AND P.O. KALITA KUCHI
P.S. HAJO
DIST. KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781102.
4: GULNAHAR BEGUM
W/O. SIRAJUL ISLAM
VILL. AND P.O. KALITA KUCHI
P.S. HAJO
DIST. KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781102.
5: TARANI DAS
S/O. LT. DOSARAM DAS
VILL. KATHAL GHOPA
P.O. KARIA
P.S. HAJO
DIST. KAMRUP (R)
ASSAM
PIN-781339
VERSUS
DR. BIJOYA CHUODHURY AND 2 ORS
SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:SURANJANA SENAPATI
DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-781019.
3:APURBA THAKURIA
DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
KAMRUP
AMINGAON
GUWAHATI-781104
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N SARMA, MR H BEZBARUA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR B KAUSHIK (R-3), BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12-06-2026
1. Mr. S.M.T.Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents/contemnors submits that a Speaking Order has already been passed rejecting the claim of provincialisation of the petitioners.
2. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is of the opinion that the order dated 17.12.2019, passed in WP(C) No. 9306/2019 is complied with.
3. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed.
4. It is provided that if the petitioners are aggrieved by the Speaking Order dated 07.08.2024, they may seek appropriate remedy available under the law.
5. Copy of the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 07.08.2024 is handed over to Mr. N. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant