Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1971/2026 of SHEIKH RIYAS ALOM Vs GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND ORS on 10 June 2026
GAHC010069282026 2026:GAU-AS:8355 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1971/2026 SHEIKH RIYAS ALOM KONARCHAR VILLAGE, SOBRIBARI POST OFFICE, HALLIDAYGANJ POLICE STATION,WEST GARO HILLS DISTRICT, MEGHALAYA STATE, PIN- 794104 VERSUS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010069282026
2026:GAU-AS:8355
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1971/2026
SHEIKH RIYAS ALOM
KONARCHAR VILLAGE, SOBRIBARI POST OFFICE, HALLIDAYGANJ
POLICE STATION,WEST GARO HILLS DISTRICT, MEGHALAYA STATE, PIN- 794104
VERSUS
GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND ORS
(THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH), TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE GEGISTRAR GENERAL, MG
ROAD, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781001
2:THE REGISTRAR(ADMINISTRATION) CUM IN CHARGE
CENTRALIZED RECRUITMENT
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
MG ROAD
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 781001
3:THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAW JUSTICE AND LEGISLATIVE
AFFAIRS GOVT OF ASSAM
ASSAM SECRETARIAT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM-781006
4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF SKILL
EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
SECRETARIAT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM-781006
5:THE DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT AND CRAFTSMEN TRAINING (DE AND
CT)
A.K AZAD ROAD
REHABARI
GUWAHATI
ASSAM- 781008
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.R. Alom, Petitioner-in-person For the Respondent(s) : Mr. G. Baishya, Sr. Advocate Ms. D. Bora, Advocate BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 11.06.2026
Mr. S.R. Alom, the petitioner-in-person submitted that the instant writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that a fresh Advertisement has been issued deleting the impugned Clause 2(c) of the Advertisement dated 18.03.2026.
2. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant