Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/536/2020 of KANMAI SONOWAL Vs BANADANA DUTTA AND 6 ORS on 10 June 2026
GAHC010163822020 2026:GAU-AS:8304 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/536/2020 KANMAI SONOWAL W/O- LT. MUNINDRA NATH SONOWAL, R/O- VILL- CHINATALLA GAONKHELMATI, P.O. BOGOLIJON, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR
GAHC010163822020
2026:GAU-AS:8304
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/536/2020
KANMAI SONOWAL
W/O- LT. MUNINDRA NATH SONOWAL, R/O- VILL- CHINATALLA
GAONKHELMATI, P.O. BOGOLIJON, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR
VERSUS
BANADANA DUTTA AND 6 ORS
THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION
(ELEMENTARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06, ASSAM
2:ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY
THE COMM. AND SECY. PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY-06
ASSAM
3:SHYAM JAGANNATHAN
THE COMM. AND SECY. FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY-06
ASSAM
4:MAORANJN KAKOTI
THE DIRECTOR
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT.
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GHY-19
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
5:SAMSUL HUSSAIN
THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
GOVT. OF ASSAM
HOUSEFED COMPLEX
DISPUR
ASSAM
6:NIRODA DOLEY PEGU
THE DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS LAKHIMPUR
P.O. AND P.S. NLP
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
PIN- 787001
7:KAMRUZ ZAMAN CHOUDHURY
THE TREASURY OFFICER LAKHIMPUR
P.O. AND P.S. NLP
DIS- LAKHIMPUR
PIN- 78700
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. D SONOWAL, Advocate for the Respondent : MS. N BORDOLOI, MR. B DEORI,MR B KAUSHIK
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11-06-2026
1. None appears for the petitioner on call.
2. None did represent the petitioner on 30.08.2024.
3. However, this Court under its order dated 30.08.2024, based on the written instruction recorded that an amount of Rs. 2,75,603/- on account of excess drawl has been refunded in the Bank Account from where the petitioner has been drawing her monthly pension.
4. Mr. S.M.T.Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents/contemnors has produced before this Court today a copy of the communication dated 10.08.2021.
5. In view of the aforesaid communication, the order dated 31.01.2020, passed in WP(C) No. 507/2020 is complied with.
6. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant