Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/546/2020 of SAHIDUR RAHMAN Vs PRITAM SAIKIA AND 3 ORS on 10 June 2026
GAHC010168992020 2026:GAU-AS:8305 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/546/2020 SAHIDUR RAHMAN S/O- LT. S.M.SAFIUR RAHMAN, EX-DPE, HAILAKANDI ATTACHED WITH SMO, SSA, ASSAM, R/O- ROOM NO. 4D, PALACIA EXOTICA, SURVEY, BELTOLA,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010168992020
2026:GAU-AS:8305
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/546/2020
SAHIDUR RAHMAN
S/O- LT. S.M.SAFIUR RAHMAN, EX-DPE, HAILAKANDI ATTACHED WITH
SMO, SSA, ASSAM, R/O- ROOM NO. 4D, PALACIA EXOTICA, SURVEY, BELTOLA, GHY- 28, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
PRITAM SAIKIA AND 3 ORS
IAS, THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION
DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:B. KALAYAN CHAKROVARTY
MISSION DIRECTOR
SARBA SIKHA ABHIJAN
KAHILIPARA
GHY-19
3:SUMITA DEY
DISTRICT MISSION CORDINATOR
SARBA SIKHA ABHIJAN
CACHAR
4:SHYAM JAGANNATHAN
COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M J BARUAH, MS S MEDHI,MS. M NEOG
Advocate for the Respondent : MS H TERANGPI, MR. D SAIKIA (R-3),MR. B CHOUDHURY (R-
2),MR. D SAIKIA,MR. B CHOUDHURY (R-2),D SAIKIA (R-2),MR B KAUSHIK
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11-06-2026
1. Heard Mr. M. J.Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.M.T.Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent/contemnor No. 1. Also heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent/contemnor Nos. 2 & 3.
2. It is submitted by Mr. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 16.12.2019 was recalled in Review Petition No. 78/2020 and a fresh direction was issued.
3. In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives to adjudicate this contempt petition.
4. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant