Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/474/2017 of PHUKAN CHANDRA NATH Vs SANJIV SINGH and 4 ORS. on 10 June 2026
GAHC010040982017 2026:GAU-AS:8297 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/474/2017 PHUKAN CHANDRA NATH S/O LT. JUPAK CHANDRA NATH R/O VILL- HABIBARANG BARI, P.O. HABIBARANG BARI, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS SANJIV SINGH and 4
GAHC010040982017
2026:GAU-AS:8297
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/474/2017
PHUKAN CHANDRA NATH
S/O LT. JUPAK CHANDRA NATH R/O VILL- HABIBARANG BARI, P.O.
HABIBARANG BARI, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
SANJIV SINGH and 4 ORS.
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. CORPORATE OFFICE, SADIQU NAGAR- 3079/3 SADIQ NAGAR J.B. TITIO MARG, NEW DELHI - 110049.
2:MR. B.S. CANTH
DIRECTOR MARKETING
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED MARKETING DIVISION MARKETING
DIVISION HEAD OFFICE
INDIAN OIL BHAWAN
G-9
ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG
BANDR EAST
MUMBAI- 400051.
3:MR. GURMEET SINGH
ED LPG
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION MARKETING
DIVISION HEAD OFFICE
INDIAN OIL BHAWAN
G-9
ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG
BANDRA EAST
MUMBAI- 400051.
4:MR. RAMESH KUMAR
GENERAL MANAGER I/C
HR
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION
EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
INDIAN OIL BHAWAN-2
GARIAHAT ROAD
DHAKURI
KOLKATA- 700068.
5:MR. DIPANKAR RAY
ED
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION INDIAN OIL AOD
STATE OFFICE
INDIAN OIL BHAWNA
SECTOR-III
NOONMATI
GUWAHATI - 781020
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M BORKAKATI, MR. A CHETRY,MR. M P SARMA,MR. U K
NAIR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M K CHOUDHURYSr.Adv.R- 4and5R-1,2and3, MR. M
SHARMA(R- 1,2&3),MR. N BARUAH(R-4)(R- 1,2&3),MR P BHARDWAJ (R- 4&5)(R- 1,2&3)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11-06-2026
1. The present contempt petition is filed alleging wilful deliberate violation of the order dated 29.09.2015 passed in WP(C) No. 2421/2009.
2. By the aforesaid order, the penalty imposed upon the petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority and affirmed by the Appellate Authority were interfered with, and the respondents were directed to give consequential benefits to the petitioner.
3. The respondents have brought on record by filing affidavit that the order has been complied with by promoting the petitioner to the next higher grade and same was also intimated to the petitioner.
4. I have perused the affidavit.
5. In my opinion, the order dated 29.09.2015 passed in WP(C) No. 2421/2009 has duly been complied with. However, if any grievance still remains, the petitioner may approach the appropriate forum by filing appropriate application.
6. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant