Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/434/2020 of SADHAN CHANDRA BANIA AND 2 ORS. Vs PREETOM SAIKIA, IAS AND ANR. on 10 June 2026
GAHC010133952020 2026:GAU-AS:8302 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/434/2020 SADHAN CHANDRA BANIA AND 2 ORS. S/O LATE DEHIRAM BANIA, VILL-SONARIGAON, P.O.-CHAKALA-GHAT, P.S.-JAJORI, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782142 2:
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010133952020
2026:GAU-AS:8302
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/434/2020
SADHAN CHANDRA BANIA AND 2 ORS.
S/O LATE DEHIRAM BANIA, VILL-SONARIGAON, P.O.-CHAKALA-GHAT, P.S.-JAJORI, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782142
2: BORJEN KUMAR SAIKIA
S/O LATE TILOK CH. SAIKIA
VILL-NO. 1 GEDAMARI
P.O.-CHAKALA-GHAT
P.S.-JAJORI
DIST-NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782142
3: SMTI. BANDONA SAIKIA
W/O BIJAN BORA
VILL-NO. 1 GEDARBORI
P.O.-CHAKALA-GHAT
P.S.-JAJORI
DIST-NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78214
VERSUS
PREETOM SAIKIA, IAS AND ANR.
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (HIGHER/HIGH), DISPUR, DIST-KAMRUP(M), ASSAM-781006
2:PHANINDRA JIDUNG
AES
DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI-1
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S BORA, MS. N CHAKRABORTY
Advocate for the Respondent : MS N M SARMA, MR S M T CHISTIE,MS. P
CHAKRABORTY,MR S NEOGI,MR. D SAIKIA,MR. N J KHATANIAR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11-06-2026
1. None appears for the petitioners on call.
2. None did represent the petitioner when the matter was listed on 17.12.2020, 04.03.2025 and 19.03.2025.
3. On the other hand, Mr. SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order dated 26.06.2019 passed in WP(C) 4992/2017 has duly been complied with.
4. Be that as it may, as none appears for the petitioners, the present contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant