Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4838/2024 of DULAL KHAKHALARY Vs BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED AND 5 ORS on 10 June 2026
GAHC010190082024 2026:GAU-AS:8321 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4838/2024 DULAL KHAKHALARY S/O- LATE DHARJYA KHAKHALARY, R/O- VILLAGE KOTHAKUTHI PART II, P.O- KOTHKUTHI, P.S- DHUPDHARA, DIST- GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783123
GAHC010190082024
2026:GAU-AS:8321
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4838/2024
DULAL KHAKHALARY
S/O- LATE DHARJYA KHAKHALARY,
R/O- VILLAGE KOTHAKUTHI PART II,
P.O- KOTHKUTHI,
P.S- DHUPDHARA,
DIST- GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783123
VERSUS
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED AND 5 ORS
REP. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER ,
BUSINESS PLAN (RETAIL NEBPCL)
1ST FLOOR,NEXIA PARK,GMCH ROAD,CHRISTIAN BASTI, GUWAHATI-
781005.
2:THE TERRITORIAL MANAGER (RETAIL)
GUWAHATI
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
1ST FLOOR
NEXIA PARK
GMCH ROAD
CHRISTIAN BASTI
GUWAHATI-781005.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
P.O
P.S AND DIST- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN-783101
4:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
(T)
GOALPARA DIVISION
P.O AND P.S- GOALPARA
DISTRICT- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN- 783101.
5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
RANGJULI REVENUE CIRCLE
RANGJULI
DISTRICT- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN- 783134.
6:THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER
RANGJULI RANGE
RANGJULI
DISTRICT- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN- 783134
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H DAS, D BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR D GOGOI, SC FOREST,MR. S BORTHAKUR (R- 1,2),MR. S S ROY(R-1,2),SC, BPCL
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 11-06-2026 Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy under the law.
Mr. S. S. Roy, learned Standing Counsel, BPCL, for respondent Nos. 1 & 2; Mr. H. K. Hazarika, learned State Counsel for respondent Nos. 3 & 5; and Mr. A.
Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department, for respondent Nos. 4 & 6, are present.
Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy as may be permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant