Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/575/2025 of MOZIR UDDIN AND 23 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 9 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010245322024 2026:GAU-AS:8217 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/575/2025 MOZIR UDDIN AND 23 ORS S/O LT. HAZI ABDUL NOOR, VILL-KHAGAIL, PO-CHATAL, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN-788720. 2: GULAM ROB S/O LT. ABDUN NOOR

GAHC010245322024

2026:GAU-AS:8217

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/575/2025

MOZIR UDDIN AND 23 ORS

S/O LT. HAZI ABDUL NOOR, VILL-KHAGAIL, PO-CHATAL, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN-788720.

2: GULAM ROB

S/O LT. ABDUN NOOR

VILL-KHAGAIL

PO-CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

3: ABDUL BASIT

S/O LT. ABDUS SALAM

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

4: SAHAB UDDIN AHMED

S/O LT. MOIN UDDIN

VILL- FATEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

5: FOKHOR UDDIN

S/O LT. HAZI ABDUL MAZID

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

6: ISLAM UDDIN

S/O LT. HAZI ABDUL NOOR

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

7: ABDUL BASIT

S/O LT. ROSMAN ALI

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O- CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

8: ATAUR RAHMAN

S/O LT. HAZI SAJID ALI

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- ATAUR 788720.

9: ABDUL KALAM AZAD

S/O LT. HAZI SAJID ALI

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

10: GIASH UDDIN KHAN

S/O LT. MANTAZ ALI

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

11: NASIR UDDIN

S/O LT. ABDUL MANAF

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

12: TAJUL ISLAM

S/O HAZI MERAB ALI

VILL-FATEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

13: FAIZUL HAQUE

S/O LT. ABDUL KHALIQUE

VILL-FATEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

14: ABDUL SAHID

S/O LT. ACHBAR HUSSAIN

VILL-FATEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

15: MANIRUJJAMAN KHAN

S/O ABDUL NAYEEM KHAN

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

16: LUKMAN UDDIN

S/O LT. SIDDIQUE ALI

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

17: ABDUL HAI

S/O LT. SIDDEQUE ALI

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

18: MOHAMMED KASRUJJAMAN KASRU

S/O ABDUL NAYEEM KHAN

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

19: AINUL ISLAM KHAN

S/O LT. BOSARAT ALI

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788720.

20: ABDUL NAYEEM KHAN

S/O LT. NASIR ALI KHAN

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

21: LIYAKAT HUSSAIN

S/O LT. TAYABUR RAHMAN

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

22: NAZRUL ISLAM

S/O ABDUR ROUF

VILL- FATEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

23: ABDUL HANNAN

S/O LT. ABDUS SAMAD

VILL- KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

24: ABUL KHAYOR

S/O LT. ABDUL RAZAK

VILL-KHAGAIL

P.O. CHATAL

DIST-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788720.

(ALL THE ABOVE PERSONS HAVE COMMON CAUSE OF ACTION AND

COMMON INTEREST)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

(REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF

ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.

2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

KARIMGANJ

P.O. AND DISTRICT-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN-788710.

3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

NILAMBAZAR REVENUE CIRCLE

PO. NILAMBAZAR

DISTRICT-KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788722

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B SINHA, MR. H ISLAM

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 10.06.2026

Heard B. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms.

N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

2. Considering the simple nature of the prayer made in this writ petition and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage.

3. The petitioners, by filing this writ petition, have prayed for a simple direction to the respondent authorities to consider and dispose of the application dated 10.04.2023, submitted by them, in respect of the land measuring 40 decimals out of 47 decimals covered by Final Khatian No. 256, Dag No. 104(o)/763(n) under Mohal/Taluk No. 15822/237 of Shyam Roy, Revenue Survey No. 5739(o)/390(n) of Village & Mouza-Khagail Pt-I, Ph-Eagarsati within Nilambazar Revenue Circle, in the Karimganj District, presently Sribhumi District.

4. The petitioners, who claim to be the sons and grandsons of the recorded Khatiandars of the subject land, contends that a market namely Khagail Bazar has been established by the villagers in the year 1953 over a plot of land measuring 47 decimals covered by Final Khatian No. 256, Dag No. 104(o)/763(n) under Mohal/Taluk No. 15822/237 of Shyam Roy, Revenue Survey No. 5739(o)/390(n), Village & Mouza-Khagail Pt-I, Ph- Eagarsati within Nilambazar Revenue Circle, in the erstwhile District of Cachar, then under Karimganj District and now Sribhumi District. It is stated that the said land was a Mirash land of Mirashdar namely Md. Nazrul Hoque, S/o Late Hazi Abdul Noor, under whom the predecessors-in- interest of the petitioners were holding the aforesaid land as rayots. It is further stated that the names of the petitioners and their predecessors were accordingly recorded in Final Khatian No. 256.

5. According to the petitioners, they have inherited the subject land after the demise of their predecessors-in-interest. The petitioners applied for inclusion of their names in the Khatian; however, the respondent authorities, without considering the grievance of the petitioners regarding recording of their names, recorded the subject land as Khas land. It is the contention of the petitioners that they have right to have their names recorded in the revenue records in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. Therefore, they submit that their application dated 10.04.2023 may be directed to be considered and disposed of.

6. Having considered the simple nature of the prayer made by the petitioners for disposal of their application for recording their names in the revenue records in terms of the applicable provisions of law and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the respondents, Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue Department and Mr. J. Handique, learned State Counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the petitioners to file a fresh application before the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, within a period of 20 (twenty) days from today. On receipt of the application, the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of the application.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of, in terms above.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead