Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1649/2020 of BUTO URANG @ BUT URANG Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. on 9 June 2026
GAHC010051882020 2026:GAU-AS:8131 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1649/2020 BUTO URANG @ BUT URANG W/O. LT. PREMSING URANG, VILL. MANGRA URANG GAON (HATUKA MANGRA BASTI), P.O. HIDIPI, P.S. DILLAI, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010051882020
2026:GAU-AS:8131
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1649/2020
BUTO URANG @ BUT URANG
W/O. LT. PREMSING URANG, VILL. MANGRA URANG GAON (HATUKA
MANGRA BASTI), P.O. HIDIPI, P.S. DILLAI, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782460.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ENVIRONMENT
AND FOREST DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-782460.
2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
4:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
WILDLIFE
ASSAM
BAISISTHA
GUWAHATI-29.
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARBI ANGLONG
DIPHU
P.O AND P.S- DIPHU
Page No.# 2/2
DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG
ASSAM
PIN- 782460.
6:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
KARBI ANGLONG
DIPHU
P.O AND P.S- DIPHU
DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG
ASSAM
PIN- 782460
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR J CHUTIA, SC, KAAC (R-6),MR D GOGOI, SC, FOREST DEPTT. (1,2,4),SC, FINANCE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10/06/2026 Heard Mr. M.R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Barman, learned State Counsel. Mr. Khandakar submits that he has received instruction not to press this writ petition and accordingly makes an endorsement to this effect. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, this writ petition stands dismissed, as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant