Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/623/2017 of SMTI. NIRU BORPATRA GOHAIN Vs PREETAM SAIKIA and ANR. on 9 June 2026
GAHC010154422017 2026:GAU-AS:8264 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/623/2017 SMTI. NIRU BORPATRA GOHAIN ASSTT. TEACHER OF JALVARI L.P.SCHOOL W/O- LT KANAK CH. GOGOI R/O-VILL KEKURI AHOM, P.O. SAMARAJAN DIST- DHEMAJI,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010154422017
2026:GAU-AS:8264
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/623/2017
SMTI. NIRU BORPATRA GOHAIN
ASSTT. TEACHER OF JALVARI L.P.SCHOOL W/O- LT KANAK CH. GOGOI
R/O-VILL KEKURI AHOM, P.O. SAMARAJAN DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM
VERSUS
PREETAM SAIKIA and ANR.
COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION
ELEMENTARY DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:SRI. SANJIB KR. BHUYAN
DIRECTOR
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GHY-1
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.N BORAH, MR.H MAZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2026
1. Heard Mr. N Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents.
Page No.# 2/2
2. This contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 19.01.2017, passed in WP(C) No.3952/2010, which was preferred by the petitioners claiming arrears of salary, wherein, it was directed to the authorities to pay the salary to the petitioner from the month of September, 2007.
3. It is submitted that in the meantime the case of the petitioner was considered and she was accommodated as a Tutor by a speaking order dated 30.01.2021.
4. Mr. N Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that though she has been accommodated as tutor, however, she is not satisfied with such a decision and that the instant contempt petition may be closed with a liberty to the petitioner to assail such appointment as tutor as she still claim that she is entitled to be appointed as Assistant Teacher.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petition stands closed with liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant