Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/519/2025 of ANUP KUMAR NATH Vs NABADEEP PATHAK, ACS on 9 June 2026
GAHC010213532025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/519/2025 ANUP KUMAR NATH S/O LATE GIRIN CHANDRA NATH, R/O VILL- RAGHUNANDANPUR, P.O.- BOITAMARI, P.S.- ABHAYAPURI, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS NABADEEP PATHAK, ACS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010213532025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/519/2025
ANUP KUMAR NATH
S/O LATE GIRIN CHANDRA NATH, R/O VILL- RAGHUNANDANPUR, P.O.- BOITAMARI, P.S.- ABHAYAPURI, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
NABADEEP PATHAK, ACS
THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, BONGAIGAON -CUM- CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE, BONGAIGAON, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, N PERVIN,MR. MUSTAFA HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D NATH, R SAHIINII
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2026 Heard Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned counsel for the sole respondent. 2] Mr. D. Nath, learned counsel for the respondent has produced a copy of minutes of meeting of the District Level Committee (DLC) regarding appointment on compassionate ground dated 11.09.2025 conducted on 11.09.2025 and submits that the case of the petitioner was considered in compliance of the order dated 20.09.2023, passed in WP(C) No. 242/2023 whereby after considering all aspects including the order of this Court, the DLC decided not to recommend the application of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground. Mr. D. Nath, learned counsel for the respondent further Page No.# 2/2 submits that in view of the above order and directions, this Court’s order dated 20.09.2023, passed in WP(C) No. 242/2023 and the contempt proceeding have substantially been complied with and therefore, he prays for closing of the contempt petition. 3] The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M. Hussain has not disputed the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondent. However, he prays for a liberty to be granted to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy in the event any surviving grievance remains.
4] The minutes of meeting of the District Level Committee regarding appointment on compassionate ground dated 11.09.2025 be kept as a part of record of this contempt proceedings and marked as Document “X”. 5] In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and the substantial compliance of the directions issued by this Court, no further order is called for in the present proceeding. 6] Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. 7] With the above observations and direction, this contempt petition stands closed. 8] It is however, made clear that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the subsequent order of the authorities, it shall be open to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available in law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant