Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/8146/2018 of OMAR ALI AND 5 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 9 June 2026
GAHC010258752018 2026:GAU-AS:8138 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8146/2018 OMAR ALI AND 5 ORS. S/O- LATE MONIR UDDIN, VILL- RAMPUR PAM, P.O- SOLAPATHAR, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM 2: NUR JAHAN BEGUM W/O- LATE ISMAIL ALI VILL-
GAHC010258752018
2026:GAU-AS:8138
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/8146/2018
OMAR ALI AND 5 ORS.
S/O- LATE MONIR UDDIN, VILL- RAMPUR PAM, P.O- SOLAPATHAR, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM
2: NUR JAHAN BEGUM
W/O- LATE ISMAIL ALI
VILL- RAMPUR PAM
P.O- SOLAPATHAR
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
3: NUREJA BEGUM
W/O- AJGOR ALI
VILL- RAMPUR PAM
P.O- SOLAPATHAR
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
4: ASHIYA KHATUN
W/O- AHED ALI
VILL- RAMPUR PAM
P.O- SOLAPATHAR
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
5: CHAND BANU
W/O- ALIM UDDINVILL- RAMPUR PAM
P.O- SOLAPATHAR
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
6: ASHIMA BEGUM
W/O- MANNAS ALI
VILL- RAMPUR PAM
P.O- SOLAPATHAR
DIST- NAGAON
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NAGAON
P.O AND DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782101
3:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(SUPPLY)
NAGAON
P.O AND DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782101
4:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782101
5:IBRAHIM ALI
S/O- LATE MOMIN ALI
VILL- SOLAPATHAR
P.O- SOLAPATHAR
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 78212
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D A KAIYUM, MR E HUSSAIN,MR. S H RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FCSCA
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10/06/2026
Heard Mr. D.A. Kayum, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. Talukdar, learned State Counsel, appearing for the respondents. Mr. Kayum submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly makes an endorsement to the said effect. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant