Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/103/2017 of HIRANYA BHUYAN Vs PREETOM SAIKIA and 2 ORS. on 9 June 2026
GAHC010123272017 2026:GAU-AS:8259 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/103/2017 HIRANYA BHUYAN W/O SRI LAKHYA KUMAR BOR GOHAIN, ASSTT. TEACHER OF KHAGARI DIHINGIA LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, DHEMAJI, DIST- and P.S. DHEMAJI, PIN-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010123272017
2026:GAU-AS:8259
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/103/2017
HIRANYA BHUYAN
W/O SRI LAKHYA KUMAR BOR GOHAIN, ASSTT. TEACHER OF KHAGARI
DIHINGIA LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, DHEMAJI, DIST- and P.S. DHEMAJI, PIN- 787057, ASSAM
VERSUS
PREETOM SAIKIA and 2 ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION
ELE DEPTT., SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GHY-6, ASSAM
2:SANJIB KR. BHUYAN
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GHY-19
ASSAM
3:NIRADA DOLEY PEGU
THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER CUM DY. INSPECTOR
OF SCHOOLS I/C
DHEMAJI
DIST- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
PIN-7870
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.U J SAIKIA, MR.A GOHAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : MS.R SHARMAR-1, MR.B CHOUDHURY(R-2),MS.R BORAH(R-
1),MR.D SAIKIA(R-1)(R-2)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2026
1. Heard Mr. A Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 21.07.2016, passed in WP(C) No.4046/2008, which was preferred by the petitioner claiming arrears of salary, wherein, it was directed to the authorities to pay the salaries to the petitioners from the month of August, 2007.
3. It is submitted that in the meantime the case of the petitioner was considered and he was accommodated as tutor in the year 2020.
4. Mr. A Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though he has been accommodated as tutor, however, he is not satisfied with such a decision and prays the instant contempt petition may be closed with a liberty to him to assail such appointment as tutor as he still claim that he is entitled to be appointed as Assistant Teacher.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petition stands closed with liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant