Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/856/2022 of NOOR AHMED CHOWDHURY AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 9 June 2026
GAHC010121062021 2026:GAU-AS:8141 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/856/2022 NOOR AHMED CHOWDHURY AND ANR VILL- AMBARI, P.O- MURAJHAR, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM 2: RANJIT CH. LASKOR S/O- BOLIN CH. LASKAR VILL- NIZ DOBOKA P.O- AND P.S-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010121062021
2026:GAU-AS:8141
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/856/2022
NOOR AHMED CHOWDHURY AND ANR
VILL- AMBARI, P.O- MURAJHAR, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM
2: RANJIT CH. LASKOR
S/O- BOLIN CH. LASKAR
VILL- NIZ DOBOKA
P.O- AND P.S- DOBOKA
DIST- HOJAI
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT and RURAL DEV. DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER
OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
ASSAM
PANJABARI
JURIPAR
GHY- 37.
ASSAM
3:THE DIRECTOR
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
ASSAM
PANJABARI
JURIPAR
GHY- 37.
4:HOJAI ZILLA PARISHAD
ZILLA PARISHAD REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M SAIKIA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
10.06.2026 None appeared for the petitioners on call. Heard Mr. S Dutta, learned Standing counsel, P&RD for the respondents. It appears that on the last occasion also, i.e., 05.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on call, despite the matter being called twice on that day. Accordingly, the matter was listed today under the ‘Orders’ column with the remark ‘for dismissal’. Today also when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the petitioners, the instant writ petition, stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant