Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/310/2016 of HEM KANTA GOGOI Vs PRITAM SAIKIA and 3 ORS on 9 June 2026
GAHC010170922016 2026:GAU-AS:8265 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/310/2016 HEM KANTA GOGOI S/O LT. TAHI RAM GOGOI, R/O MOROTIA, P.O. SAPOTIA VIA MACHKHOWA, P.S. DHAKUAKHANA, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-787058 VERSUS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010170922016
2026:GAU-AS:8265
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/310/2016
HEM KANTA GOGOI
S/O LT. TAHI RAM GOGOI, R/O MOROTIA, P.O. SAPOTIA VIA MACHKHOWA, P.S. DHAKUAKHANA, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-787058
VERSUS
PRITAM SAIKIA and 3 ORS
COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:SANJIB KR. BHUYAN
DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GHY-19
3:DEBASISH BAISHYA
I/C DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
DHAKUAKHANA
LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
4:R. DOLEY
BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
DHAKUAKHANA
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.L MOHAN, MS.A DAS,MR.J I BORBHUIYA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.R MAZUMDARR-1and2, MR.H BEZBARUAH(R-1&2),MR.D
CHETIA(R-2),MR.N SARMA(R-1)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2026
1. None appears for the petitioner on call. However, Mr. SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
2. This contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 06.05.2015, passed in WP(C) No.3293/2013, WP(C) No.4211/2013, WP(C) No.3754/2010 and WP(C) No.5213/2013, which was preferred by the petitioner and others claiming arrears of salary, wherein, it was directed to the authorities to pay the salaries to the petitioner along with others from the month of August, 2007.
3. It is submitted by Mr. SMT Chistie that in the meantime the case of the petitioner was considered and he was accommodated as tutor by a speaking order dated 13.01.2022.
4. Be that as it may, as none appears for the petitioner on call, the matter stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant