Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/574/2017 of NABAJYOTI NEOG Vs PREETOM SAIKIA and 3 ORS on 9 June 2026
GAHC010052122017 2026:GAU-AS:8263 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/574/2017 NABAJYOTI NEOG W/O SRI DEBA KANTA CHUTIA, R/O VILL- JUKTALI, PO- GUTANG, DIST. DHEMAJI, PIN-787057, ASSAM VERSUS PREETOM SAIKIA and 3 ORS THE
GAHC010052122017
2026:GAU-AS:8263
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/574/2017
NABAJYOTI NEOG
W/O SRI DEBA KANTA CHUTIA, R/O VILL- JUKTALI, PO- GUTANG, DIST.
DHEMAJI, PIN-787057, ASSAM
VERSUS
PREETOM SAIKIA and 3 ORS
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION ELEMENTARY DEPTT., SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:SRI SANJIB KR. BHUYAN
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-781019
3:SMT. NIRADA DOLEY PEGU
THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
DHEMAJI
DIST. DHEMAJI
PIN- 787057
ASSAM
4:SRI ANADAR DOLEY
THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
DHEMAJI
DIST. DHEMAJI
PIN-787057
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.U J SAIKIA, MR.A GOHAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2026
1. Heard Mr. A Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 19.01.2017, passed in WP(C) No.4636/2010, which was preferred by the petitioner claiming arrears of salary, wherein, it was directed to the authorities to pay the salary to the petitioner from the month of August, 2007.
3. It is submitted that in the meantime the case of the petitioner was considered and that she was accommodated as tutor in the year 2020.
4. Mr. A Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though she has been accommodated as tutor, however, she is not satisfied with such a decision and prays that the instant contempt petition may be closed with a liberty to assail such appointment as tutor as she still claims that she is entitled to be appointed as Assistant Teacher.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petition stands closed with liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant