Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2204/2024 of RASHMI HAZARIKA AND 3 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 8 June 2026
GAHC010077042024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2204/2024 RASHMI HAZARIKA AND 3 ORS. W/O- LATE BIJU HAZARIKA, VILL- PUTHINODI GAON, P.S.- MARIANI, DIST.- JORHAT, ASSAM. 2: RINKU HAZAIRKA S/O- LATE BIJU HAZARIKA
GAHC010077042024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2204/2024
RASHMI HAZARIKA AND 3 ORS.
W/O- LATE BIJU HAZARIKA,
VILL- PUTHINODI GAON,
P.S.- MARIANI,
DIST.- JORHAT, ASSAM.
2: RINKU HAZAIRKA
S/O- LATE BIJU HAZARIKA
VILL- PUTHINODI GAON
P.S.- MARIANI
DIST.- JORHAT
ASSAM.
3: RAJA HAZARIKA
SO- LATE BIJU HAZARIKA
VILL- PUTHINODI GAON
P.S.- MARIANI
DIST.- JORHAT
ASSAM.
4: NIRU HAZARIKA
W/O- LATE NONDI HAZARIKA
M/O- LATE BIJU HAZARIKA
VILL- PUTHINODI GAON
P.S.- MARIANI
DIST.- JORHAT
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM,
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-06.
2:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ASSAM STATE DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
SECRETARIAT
GHY-06.
3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GHY-07.
4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
JORHAT
BARUAH CHOWK
AT ROAD
ATILAGAON
JORHAT
ASSAM
785001.
5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
JORHAT
BARUAH CHOWK
AT ROAD
ATILAGAON
JORHAT
ASSAM
785001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, MR. O ULLAH,I AMIN
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09.06.2026
Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on having been become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant