Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6683/2023 of PARICHITA PAUL CHAUDHURI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 7 June 2026
GAHC010260642023 2026:GAU-AS:7923 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6683/2023 PARICHITA PAUL CHAUDHURI W/O- MANAJIT PAUL CHAUDHURI, R/O- H/NO. 4, DEB KUTIR LANE, ULUBARI, G.S. ROAD, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, GUWAHATI- 781007.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010260642023
2026:GAU-AS:7923
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6683/2023
PARICHITA PAUL CHAUDHURI
W/O- MANAJIT PAUL CHAUDHURI,
R/O- H/NO. 4, DEB KUTIR LANE,
ULUBARI, G.S. ROAD, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, GUWAHATI- 781007.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781005.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP(M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781036.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE
ULUBARI
KAMRUP(M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 791007
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS D BORGOHAIN, MS M BORAH,MS. J PURKAYASTHA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.06.2026 Heard Ms. J. Purkayastha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Das, learned government Advocate appearing for the State respondent as well as Ms. M. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue Department. Ms. J. Purkayastha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that she has received instructions not to press the instant writ petition as the issue involved in the writ petition has already become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant