Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/291/2026 of JOHURUDDIN AHMED Vs MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND 2 ORS. on 7 June 2026
GAHC010106532026 2026:GAU-AS:7974 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/291/2026 JOHURUDDIN AHMED S/O SUMESH UDDIN, R/O SONERTARI, P.O.- PACHIM MAZDIA, PIN-781305, MOUZA- CHENGA, P.S.- TARABARI, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM,
GAHC010106532026
2026:GAU-AS:7974
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/291/2026
JOHURUDDIN AHMED
S/O SUMESH UDDIN, R/O SONERTARI, P.O.- PACHIM MAZDIA, PIN-781305, MOUZA- CHENGA, P.S.- TARABARI, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM, INDIA
VERSUS
MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND 2 ORS.
THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FOR THE REVENUE AND D.M. DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6.
2:ROHAN KUMAR JHA
IAS
DISTRCT COMMISSIONER
BARPETA
ASSAM-781301.
3:SAMEER CHOUDHURY
ALRS
CIRCLE OFFICER
BARPETA REVENUE CIRCLE
SUNDARIDIA
BARPETA-781314
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H SAIKIA, MR K KASHYAB,MR. B BORAH,MR. K
KALITA,MR. L M RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08-06-2026 Heard Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Having considered the matter as regards the alleged willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 20.01.2026, Mr. N. Das, learned State Counsel, was earlier requested to obtain necessary instructions.
In deference to the said request, Mr. N. Das, learned State Counsel, has placed the copy of the order dated 27.05.2026, passed by the Circle Officer, Barpeta Revenue Circle, by which the case of the petitioner has been rejected for non-submission of mandatory up-to-date Land Revenue Payment Receipt (Khajana Receipt) as required under the applicable notification regulating the procedure of Composite Land Transfer Services.
In view of the above, this Court finds that the direction contained in the order dated 20.01.2026 has been duly complied with. Thus, there is no willful disobedience of the order of this Court. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.
Needless to observe that the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 27.05.2026 in accordance with law, if so advised.
A copy of the order dated 27.05.2026, passed by the Circle Officer, Barpeta Revenue Circle, is kept on record and marked as document “X”.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant