Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1496/2026 of SHRI KAUSTAV KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 7 June 2026
GAHC010044182026 2026:GAU-AS:8030 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1496/2026 SHRI KAUSTAV KUMAR DAS SON OF SRI ANIL KUMAR DAS, RESIDENT OF ANDEVA ENCLAVE, HOUSE NO. 251, RAJGARH ROAD, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI- 781003, DISTRICT-
GAHC010044182026
2026:GAU-AS:8030
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1496/2026
SHRI KAUSTAV KUMAR DAS
SON OF SRI ANIL KUMAR DAS, RESIDENT OF ANDEVA ENCLAVE, HOUSE
NO. 251, RAJGARH ROAD, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI- 781003, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006
3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06
4:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY (I) TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BARPETA
ASSAM
6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-03
7:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
LOWER ASSAM ZONE
WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT
GUWAHATI-03
8:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT
BARPETA DIVISIO
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. I. Borthakur, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. P. Chakraborty, Standing Counsel Mr. J. Handique, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.06.2026
Heard Mr. I. Borthakur, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Ms. P. Chakraborty, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Water Resources Department and Mr. J. Handique, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Revenue and Disaster Management Department.
2. The Petitioner herein has approached this Court stating that an amount of Rs. 44,39,542/- had remained outstanding to be paid against a contract work executed by him, i.e., “Immediate measures to protect Bahari Satra, Fulbari, Bhogerpar and its adjoining areas from the erosion of river Brahmaputra for 2007- 08 under C.R.F” pursuant to a Work Order dated 30.04.2008. The Petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of a writ petition being WP(C) No. 934/2014 and the writ petition was disposed of vide an Order dated 21.02.2014 with a direction to the Respondent Authorities to consider the payment of the contractual bill of the Petitioner in terms of the guidelines formulated by the decision in Tamsher Ali Vs. State of Assam & others reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1. When the Petitioner sought information from the Respondent Authorities under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, the Respondent Authorities through the State Public Information Officer informed that the amount has still remained outstanding to be paid. Seeking a direction to the Respondent Authorities to disburse the said amount of Rs. 44,39,542/-, the instant writ petition is filed.
3. Ms. P. Chakraborty, the learned Standing Counsel, Water Resources Department and Mr. J. Handique, the learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department submitted that the entitlement of the Petitioner would depend upon verification to be carried out by the Respondent Authorities.
4. Upon perusal of the materials on record, this Court is of the opinion that if the Petitioner had completed the above- mentioned work as per the terms and conditions agreed upon, the Petitioner should be paid the amount to which the Petitioner is entitled to. However, for the same, verification on the part of the Respondent Authorities would be required.
5. This Court, therefore, disposes of the instant writ petition with the following observations and directions:-
i) The Respondent Authorities shall verify as to whether the Petitioner had successfully executed the work, i.e. “Immediate measures to protect Bahari Satra, Fulbari, Bhogerpar and its adjoining areas from the erosion of river Brahmaputra for 2007-08 under C.R.F”.
ii) The Respondent Authorities shall also verify as to whether the Petitioner had submitted the requisite documents which are required for the purpose of releasing the amount due as claimed by the Petitioner.
iii) The Respondent Authorities shall also verify the entitlement of the Petitioner to the dues, and if upon verification in the manner stated above, it is found that the Petitioner is entitled to any such amount, the Respondent Authorities shall pay the same to the Petitioner.
iv) The above exercise be completed within a period of 6 (six) months from the date a certified copy of the instant order is served upon the Respondent No.6, i.e. The Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant