Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2266/2026 of ABUBAKKAR SIDDIK Vs BANDHAN BANK AND 3 ORS on 7 June 2026
GAHC010082402026 2026:GAU-AS:7929 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2266/2026 ABUBAKKAR SIDDIK S/O ABDUL ALIM,VILL - BALARPATHAR, P.O - SHOWPUR, P.S - KALGACHIA, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM.PIN-781319 VERSUS BANDHAN BANK AND 3
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010082402026
2026:GAU-AS:7929
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2266/2026
ABUBAKKAR SIDDIK
S/O ABDUL ALIM,VILL - BALARPATHAR, P.O - SHOWPUR, P.S - KALGACHIA, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM.PIN-781319
VERSUS
BANDHAN BANK AND 3 ORS
REGIONAL OFFICE,REPRESENTED BY THE VICE PRESIDENT,AG TOWER, SURVEY, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI- 28, ASSAM.
2:THE CHAIRMAN
BANDHAN BANK
DN 32
SECTOR V
SALT LAKE CITY
KOLKATA -700091
WEST BENGAL
INDIA.
3:THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
HAVING ITS CENTRAL OFFICE AT SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH
FORT
MUMBAI- 400021.
4:THE BRANCH MANAGER
BANDHAN BANK
BARPETA ROAD BRANCH
DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN-78135
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SAIFUL ISLAM, MR. R ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.06.2026 Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. It appears that the instant writ petition was necessitated on account of the petitioner’s Current Account maintained with Bandhan Bank, Barpeta Road Branch, Barpeta, having been frozen without prior notice. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, the bank authorities have defreezed the said account. Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel, submits that in view of the aforesaid development, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant