Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6964/2023 of NUR JAMAL SHEIKH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 7 June 2026
GAHC010269802023 2026:GAU-AS:8022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6964/2023 NUR JAMAL SHEIKH S/O FAYEZUDDIN SHEIKH, VILL-RAJAPARA PT. I, P.O. AND P.S.- BAGRIBARI, DIST-KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM, PIN-783349 VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010269802023
2026:GAU-AS:8022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6964/2023
NUR JAMAL SHEIKH
S/O FAYEZUDDIN SHEIKH, VILL-RAJAPARA PT. I, P.O. AND P.S.- BAGRIBARI, DIST-KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM, PIN-783349
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL (BTC)
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN-783370
3:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY
BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN-783370
4:THE SECRETARY
(GAD) BTC
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN-783370
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KOKRAJHAR
BTC
ASSAM
DIST- KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN-783370
6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BAGRIBARI REVENUE CIRCLE
BAGRIBARI
DIST-KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN-78334
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. H. R. Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. R. Sarmah, SC, BTC
Mr. S. Dutta, SC, Revenue
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
08.06.2026
The Petitioner herein has approached this Court being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Respondent Authorities to make payment of his outstanding dues for hiring of the vehicle to the Petitioner.
2. Mr. N. R. Sarmah, the learned Standing Counsel of the BTC submitted that pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 12.12.2025, the Petitioner had approached the Respondent Authorities by submitting the bills as per the approved rate of the
BTC. In pursuance thereto, the financial sanction has already been granted to the Petitioner. In that regard, the instructions dated 06.06.2026 along with the financial sanction order dated 06.06.2026 has been placed before this Court which is kept on record and marked with the letter 'X'.
3. From the said instructions as well as the financial sanctions, it is seen that an amount of Rs.4,68,000/- has been sanctioned to be released to the Petitioner.
4. Mr. H. R. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that in view of the said financial sanction being granted, as the Petitioner would be receiving the present amount, the Petitioner would not like to further pursue the instant proceedings.
5. Accordingly, this Court closes the instant writ petition with a direction upon the Respondent Authorities that in pursuance to the financial sanction being issued, the said amount be disbursed to the Petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of the present order.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant