Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2431/2024 of HANDIQUE AND BARUWA ENTERPRISE PVT. LTD., Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS. on 7 June 2026
GAHC010092102024 2026:GAU-AS:7928 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2431/2024 HANDIQUE AND BARUWA ENTERPRISE PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HANCHARA GOHAIN GAON, SIMALUGURI MOUZA, TEOK, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, BEING REPRESENTED
GAHC010092102024
2026:GAU-AS:7928
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2431/2024
HANDIQUE AND BARUWA ENTERPRISE PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HANCHARA GOHAIN GAON, SIMALUGURI
MOUZA, TEOK, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS
DIRECTOR, SRI KARANJYOTI HANDIQUE, S/O- SR. DHRUBA JYOTI
HANDIQUE, R/O- KOTHIALHUNDA GAON, P.O. AND P.S. SAPEKHATI, DIST.
SIVASAGAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT
AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
2:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN HAVING ITS HEADQUARTERS AT SECTOR-10
DWARKA
NEW DELHI-110075
NEW DELHI.
3:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI NRDFI HOUSE
4TH FLOOR
GS ROAD
DISPUR
GHY-06
ASSAM
REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR.
4:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION (NHIDCL)
PTI BUILDING 4
PARLIAMENT STREET
SAMAD MARG AREA
NEW DELHI-110001.
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
JORHAT
DIST. JORHAT
PIN- 785001.
6:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER/ BRANCH OFFICER
(LAND ACQUISITION BRANCH)
JORHAT DISTRICT- JORHAT
PIN- 7800
ASSAM (COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS
ACT
1956).
7:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
TEOK REVENUE CIRCLE
TEAOK
DIST. JORHAT
ASSAM
PIN- 785001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B SHARMA, MR S SHARMA,MR. M HASSAN
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, NHIDC,SC, NHAI,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.06.2026 None appeared for the petitioner on call. Mr. R K Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 is present. Despite the matter being called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on call, though the names of the learned counsels for the petitioner have been reflected in the cause list today. In view of the above, the instant writ petition, stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant