Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1715/2026 of ANSHAB ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 7 June 2026
GAHC010060152026 2026:GAU-AS:7930 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1715/2026 ANSHAB ALI S/O LATE ASKER ALI, VILL. BOALKAMARI PART II, P.O. BARKANDA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010060152026
2026:GAU-AS:7930
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1715/2026
ANSHAB ALI
S/O LATE ASKER ALI, VILL. BOALKAMARI PART II, P.O. BARKANDA, DIST.
DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF
ASSAM, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT. GUWAHATI -6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
4:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX
LAST GATE
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
5:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19.
6:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
Page No.# 2/2
DHUBRI DISTRICT CIRCLE
DHUBRI
7:THE TREASURY OFFICER
DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN- 783301.
8:THE PRINCIPAL
KAJAIKATA P.M. ACADEMY H.S. SCHOOL
DHUBRI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H LASKAR, MR. P K DEKA,MR. P DAIMARY,MR. R.
KARIM
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE,SC, SEC. EDU.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.06.2026
Mr. P. Daimary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instruction, submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the submission as made above by Mr. Daimary, learned counsel for the petitioner; the instant writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Ms. P. Das, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department, is present on behalf of the State Respondents.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant