Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1843/2026 of SRI GANSWAER DEKA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 4 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010109082026 2026:GAU-AS:7851 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1843/2026 SRI GANSWAER DEKA SON OF LT. TUWARAM DEKA R/O PO-BHUYANKHAT PS-KOLAIGAON DIST.-UDALGURI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE

GAHC010109082026

2026:GAU-AS:7851

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1843/2026

SRI GANSWAER DEKA

SON OF LT. TUWARAM DEKA R/O PO-BHUYANKHAT PS-KOLAIGAON

DIST.-UDALGURI, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, TO THE GOVT. OF

ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT S DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM

2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM

REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT S DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

ASSAM

3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWRD EAP

ASSAM

FATASIL

AMBARI

GUWAHATI-25

4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

UDALGURI

DISTRICT-UDALGURI

BTR

ASSAM

5:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

UDALGURI

BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION CUM CHAIRMAN

COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR LAND ACQUISITION CALA DISTRICT- UDALGURI

BTR ASSAM

6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

KOLAIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE

DIST.-UDALGURI

ASSAM

7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

PWD ROAD

UDALGURI

BTR

ASSAM

8:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM.

9:SRI DANDADHAR BARUAH

SON OF LT. GANGARAM BARUAH R.O PO-BHUYANKHAT PS-KOLAIGAON

DIST.-UDALGURI

ASSAM

10:THE BRANCH MANAGER

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

TANGLA BRANCH

TANGLA

UDALGURI

ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, MS D DUTTA,B SHARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/5995/2024

GANESWAR DEKA

S/O- LATE TUWA RAM DEKA

R/O- BHUYANKHAT

P.O- BHUYANKHAT

P.S- KOLAIGAON

DIST- DARRANG

ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM

REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

JANATA BHAWAN (ASSAM SECRETARIAT COMPLEX)

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006.

2:THE JOINT SECRETARY

TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

JANATA BHAWAN (ASSAM SECRETARIAT COMPLEX)

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006.

3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER

PWRD (EAP)

ASSAM

FATASIL AMBARI

GUWAHATI-25

4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

UDALGURI

BTR

ASSAM

5:THE ADDL.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

UDALGURI

BTR CUM CHAIRMAN COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR LAND ACQUISITION

DIST- UDALGURI

BTR

ASSAM

6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

KALAIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE

UDALGURI

BTR

ASSAM

7:KABERI RONGPIPI

CIRCLE OFFICER

KALAIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE

DIST.-UDALGURI

BTR

ASSAM

8:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

KOKRAJHAR

BTC

ASSAM

------------

Advocate for : MR. P J SAIKIA

Advocate for : SC

REVENUE appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Date : 05.06.2026.

Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Barman, learned State Counsel for the State respondent and Mr. H. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent No.7. This interlocutory application is filed seeking impleadment of Sri Dandadhar Baruah and the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Tangla Branch in the connected writ petition i.e. WP(C) No.5995/2024.

The applicant/writ petitioner filed the connected WP(C) No.5995/2024, challenging the freezing of his bank account in the Central Bank of India, Tangla Branch, on the complaint of one Sri Dandadhar Baruah, who is sought to be impleaded as party respondent No.9 along with the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Tangla Branch as the respondent No.10, in the said writ petition. Having considered the issue involved in the connected writ petition and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that Sri Dandadhar Baruah and the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Tangla Branch appears to be necessary parties in the connected writ petition i.e. WP(C) No.5995/2024, as the freezing of the bank account of the petitioner, on the basis of complaint of the party sought to be impleaded as respondent No.9 in the Bank of the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Tangla Branch sought to be impleaded as respondent No.10, is put to challenge in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, Sri Dandadhar Baruah and the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Tangla Branch are allowed to be impleaded as the party respondent Nos.9 & 10, in the connected writ petition. This interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead