Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7569/2018 of SAIFUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 4 June 2026
GAHC010243002018 2026:GAU-AS:7871 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7569/2018 SAIFUL ISLAM S/OLT. NUR HUSSAIN R/O VILL- DHAKAI BASTY P.O. DHUPAGURI PO.S. DHING DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM PIN - 782123, PH.NO. 7896572160 VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010243002018
2026:GAU-AS:7871
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7569/2018
SAIFUL ISLAM
S/OLT. NUR HUSSAIN
R/O VILL- DHAKAI BASTY
P.O. DHUPAGURI
PO.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM
PIN - 782123,
PH.NO. 7896572160
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 6.
2:DISTRICT WATER SANITATION COMMITTEE
NAGAON DISTRICT
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NAGAON
PIN-782002.
3:THE MEMBER SECRETARY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING
MORIGAON
NAGAON DIVISION
PIN - 782002
4:THE PRESIDENT OF PATIA CHAPORI ROUMARI GAON PANCHAYAT
R/O VILL- SOLOGURI
P.O. SOLOGURI
Page No.# 2/2
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN - 782123
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SHARMAH, MR. M AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P H E
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05-06-2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Heard Mr. S. Sarmah, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3/PHE and Mr. S.K. Hazarika, learned State Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 & 2. This matter has been listed today in the order column with the remark “for dismissal”, in view of the fact that on the last occasion, i.e., 03.06.2026, when the matter was last listed, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter has been called by reflecting the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that too with the remark “for dismissal”, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on call. In view of the consecutive nonappearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant