Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1905/2022 of NANDINI DUTTA Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND 6 ORS on 4 June 2026
GAHC010050502022 2026:GAU-AS:7849 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1905/2022 NANDINI DUTTA W/O NRIPEN DUTTA, GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE MILES BRONSON EDUCATION SOCIETY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT VIP ROAD, AZARA, GUWAHATI-15, KAMRUP,
GAHC010050502022
2026:GAU-AS:7849
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1905/2022
NANDINI DUTTA
W/O NRIPEN DUTTA, GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE MILES BRONSON
EDUCATION SOCIETY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT VIP ROAD, AZARA, GUWAHATI-15, KAMRUP, ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR-CUM-MEMBER
SECRETARY, HARYANA MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION
COUNCIL-CUM-DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, HARYANA 30 BAYS BUILDING, SECTOR 17 CHANDIGARH, PUNJAB, PIN- 122001
2:SATISH AHLAWAT
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (RETD.)
SOLE ARBITRATOR HOUSE NO
W-7/12 DLF
PHASE-III
GURGAON-122001 (HARYANA)
3:ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
GURUGRAM
HARYANA-122001
4:STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE
TAXATION DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
5:TAPIO YFM DESIGNS PVT. LTD.
PLOT NO. 5430
PACE CITY-2
SECTOR 37
GURUGRAM-122001
HARYANA
6:STATE BANK OF INDIA
GUWAHATI AIRPORT BRANCH
BORJHAR
GUWAHATI-1
DIST-KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
7:THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
YADAV BHAWAN
OLD RAILWAY ROAD
GURUGRAM (MAIN BRACH OFFICE AT PANBAZAR
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP
ASSAM
78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D P CHALIHA, MS M ROY,MD R ALI,MR L P SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, MR. A DHANUKA (R-7),MR. A GANGULY(R-
7),MR B DAS (R-6),MR G JALAN (R-6)
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Date : 05.06.2026.
Heard Mr. D.P. Chaliha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. M. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to pursue the statutory remedy and till the petitioner approaches the appropriate authority, the impugned award and attachment order may not be given effect to. Ms. I. Kumari, learned counsel is present on behalf of Mr. G. Jalan, learned counsel for the respondent No.6 is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal, with the liberty as prayed for. In the interest of justice, the impugned award as well as the attachment order shall not be given effect till the petitioner approaches the appropriate authority within 25 (twenty five) days.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant