Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1834/2026 of M/S BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI AND SONS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. on 4 June 2026
GAHC010109132026 2026:GAU-AS:7820- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1834/2026 M/S BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI AND SONS A HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY (HUF), HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GAUHATI ROLLER FLOUR MILL LTD., G.S ROAD,
GAHC010109132026
2026:GAU-AS:7820-
DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1834/2026
M/S BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI AND SONS
A HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY (HUF), HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
GAUHATI ROLLER FLOUR MILL LTD., G.S ROAD, P.O. AND P.S.- DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS KARTA SRI
BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI, SON OF LATE KISTUR CHAND BAGRI RESIDENT
OF GAUHATI ROLLER FLOUR MILLS LTD., G.S ROAD, P.O. AND P.S.- DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, 7881005
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF POSTS, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, DAK
BHAWAN, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI- 110001.
2:THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL
ASSAM CIRCLE
MEGHDOOT BHAWAN
GUWAHATI-1.
3:THE POSTMASTER GENERAL
ASSAM CIRCLE
MEGHDOOT BHAWAN
GUWAHATI-1.
4:THE SENIOR POSTMASTER GENERAL
ASSAM CIRCLE
MEGHDOOT BHAWAN
GUWAHATI-1.
5:THE DEPUTY POSTMASTER
ASSAM CIRCLE
MEGHDOOT BHAWAN
GUWAHATI-1
6:THE POST MASTER
PALTAN BAZAR POST OFFICE
GUWAHAT
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R S MISHRA, MS. M DEY,MS B SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., For the Applicant(s)/Appellant(s) : Mr. R.S.Mishra, counsel For the Respondent(s)/opposite party(s) : Mr. S.K.Medhi, CGC
BEFORE
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
05-06-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J)
1. We have heard Mr. R.S.Mishra, learned counsel, for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. S.K.Medhi, learned Central Government Counsel, for the respondents/ opposite parties.
2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of the delay of 48 days in preferring the connected Writ Appeal against the Judgment and Order (Oral) dated 11.03.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C)
No. 3123/2025.
3. Perused the averments made in the application.
4. Mr. Medhi, learned CGC submits that he has no instruction to object to the present application.
5. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay of 48 days in preferring the connected appeal.
6. We, therefore, condone the delay.
7. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off.
8. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect free, list it on 09.09.2026 under the appropriate heading.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant