Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1087/2026 of PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. on 3 June 2026
GAHC010037872026 2026:GAU-AS:7808 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1087/2026 PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR W/O LATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH R/O VIL- ALENGMARI, P.O. LAKHIGANJ P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783345 2: BIBHUJIT
GAHC010037872026
2026:GAU-AS:7808
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1087/2026
PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR
W/O LATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH
R/O VIL- ALENGMARI, P.O. LAKHIGANJ P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783345
2: BIBHUJIT NATH
S/OLATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH
R/O VILL- ALENGMARI
P.O. LAKHIGANJ
P.S. BILASIPARA
DIST. DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-783345
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, REVENUE (LR) DEPTT. DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DHUBRI
DIST. DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN- 783301.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE
P.O. BILASIPARA
DIST. DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-78334
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M A ISLAM, MS L DAS,MR J I MONDAL
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 04.06.2026
Heard Mr. M. A. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners.
By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to grant sale permission in respect of a plot of land measuring 1 Bigha 1 Katha 9 Lechas, covered by Dag No. 2, Patta No. 86, situated at Village Bhashanigaon, under Bilasipara Revenue Circle, District Dhubri, Assam.
The respondent authorities filed an affidavit which reflects that, after examination and consideration of the application for sale permission, the matter was placed before the Additional Deputy Commissioner, who, by an order dated 15.02.2026, has rejected the application of the petitioner.
In view of above, Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh challenging the rejection order dated 15.02.2026.
Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel, are present. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty to the petitioners to file afresh against the order of rejection dated 15.02.2026, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant