Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026 of ABU BAKKAR SIIDDIQUE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 2 June 2026
GAHC010079372026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026 in WP(C)/2186/2026 ABU BAKKAR SIIDDIQUE SON OF SATTAR ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIRSHING PART-I P.O. AND P.S. FAKIRGANJ DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783330
GAHC010079372026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1745/2026
in WP(C)/2186/2026
ABU BAKKAR SIIDDIQUE
SON OF SATTAR ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIRSHING PART-I
P.O. AND P.S. FAKIRGANJ
DISTRICT DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-783330
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARYTO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT ANDRURAL DEVELOPMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
PIN- 781006
ASSAM.
2:THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
ASSAM
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301
4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO)
DHUBRI
5:THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
DHUBRI
6:ASMA KHATUN
WIFE OFHAZRAT ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGEBIRSHING PART-I P.O. AND
P.S.FAKIRGANJ DISTRICT DHUBRIASSAM PIN-783330
7:ROFIQUL ISLAM
S/O CHAN MIYA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIRSHINGPART-IIP.O. AND P.S.
FAKIRGANJDISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM PIN783330
------------
Advocate for : MR. SURAJIT DAS
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 03.06.2026
Heard Mr. A. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel for the respondent No. 3. This is an application praying for impleadment of Sri Rofiqul Islam, son of Chan Miya of Birshing Part-III village, P.O & P.S.-Fakirganj, Dhubri, as party respondent in WP(C) 2186/2026. The petitioner filed the connected writ petition assailing the rejection of the election petition with regard to the challenge to the election of the respondent No. 6, namely, Asma Khatun. The party sought to be impleaded had filed a caveat in the connected writ petition who was a party in the election petition. This Court on 24.04.2026 while issuing notice in the connected writ petition has directed the applicant/writ petitioner to file appropriate application for impleadment of caveator, who was a party in the election petition.
Considering the fact that the party sought to be impleaded was a party in the election petition and also considering the fact that this Court had already directed the applicant/writ petitioner to file an application for impleadment of the caveator, I deem it proper to allow this application. Accordingly, Sri Rofiqul Islam is allowed to implead as respondent No. 7 in the connected writ petition. Interlocutory application is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant