Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2001/2026 of RUMA MEDHI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 2 June 2026
GAHC010068222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2001/2026 RUMA MEDHI D/O LATE SIDDIRAM MEDHI ALIAS KHIDDHIRAM MEDHI, R/O VILL. HAHARA, BORGOG, P.O. HAHARA, P.S. SONAPUR, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN 782402 VERSUS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010068222026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2001/2026
RUMA MEDHI
D/O LATE SIDDIRAM MEDHI ALIAS KHIDDHIRAM MEDHI, R/O VILL.
HAHARA, BORGOG, P.O. HAHARA, P.S. SONAPUR, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN 782402
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI 06
2:THE ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER/SECRETARY
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
OLD BUILDING
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
PIN- 781001
3:THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY
KAMRUP(M)
REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER/SECRETARY
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE'S COURT CAMPUS
PANBAZAR
GUWAHATI
DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN- 780001
4:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
SONAPUR POLICE STATION
P.O- SONAPUR
DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M)
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM
PIN- 78240
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R Deka, S I AKAND
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORTY
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 03.06.2026
Mr. S. I. Akand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority. Mr. R. Das, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant