Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/843/2022 of VIJAYA POLYMERS INDIA PVT LTD CONSORTIUM AND ANR Vs ASSAM GAS COMPANY LTD AND ANR on 2 June 2026
GAHC010024722022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/843/2022 VIJAYA POLYMERS INDIA PVT LTD CONSORTIUM AND ANR HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 1-98/9/3/52 PLOT NO 54 1FT FLOOR, SILICON VALLEY, IMAGE GARDENS ROAD,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010024722022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/843/2022
VIJAYA POLYMERS INDIA PVT LTD CONSORTIUM AND ANR
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 1-98/9/3/52 PLOT NO 54 1FT FLOOR, SILICON VALLEY, IMAGE GARDENS ROAD, MADHAPUR, HYDERABAD
500081
2: D. VIRAL RAJ
S/O D.T. VINOD KUMAR
R/O 157/7 KAMALA
ROAD NO. 4 GUNROCK ENCLAVE
SECUNDERABAD 500009 AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF VIJAYA
POLYMERS INDIA PVT. LTD. CONSORTIUM
VERSUS
ASSAM GAS COMPANY LTD AND ANR
A GOVT. OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR AND DGM (GMB), P.O DULIAJAN, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN 786602
2:VCS QUALITY SERVICES PVT. LTD.
B-10
2ND FLOOR
BAJAJ BHAWAN
SECTOR-3
NOIDA 201301(UP
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S RAVI G., MR. B PANDEY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR S N SARMA SENIOR ADVOCATE, FOR CAVEATOR,MR. M
HUSSAIN
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 03.06.2026
None appears for the petitioner on call. Office note dated 12.02.2026 reflects that the petitioner has failed to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent No. 2, despite the order for steps dated 14.02.2022. The matter pertains to rejection of bid of the petitioner at the bid evaluation stage. Considering the above, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue the case. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant