Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4528/2022 of JUNU DAS CHETRY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 2 June 2026
GAHC010132382022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4528/2022 JUNU DAS CHETRY W/O- LATE BHIM BAHADUR CHETRY, R/O- VILL- PAHARPARA, P.O. AND P.S. NAGARBERA, DIST- KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN- 781127. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010132382022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4528/2022
JUNU DAS CHETRY
W/O- LATE BHIM BAHADUR CHETRY, R/O- VILL- PAHARPARA, P.O. AND
P.S. NAGARBERA, DIST- KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN- 781127.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL DEFENCE
ASSAM
BELTOLA
GUWAHATI-28.
4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ( A AND E)
ASSAM
BELTOLA
MAIDAMGAON
GUWAHATI-29.
5:THE COMMANDANT ASRF BN-1
BARJHAR
NALBARI
PIN- 781346.
6:THE COMMANDANT OF ASRF
BN-11
Page No.# 2/2
KARAGAON
KARBI ANGLONG
ASSAM. PIN- 782480.
7:THE TREASURY OFFICER
AMINGAON TREASURY
DIST.- KAMRUP(R)
ASSAM
PIN- 781039
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI, MS CHITRALEKHA DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AG,SC, FINANCE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 03.06.2026 Heard Ms. P. Talukdar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. R. Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. H. K. Hazarika, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent. Ms. P. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has received instructions from the petitioner not press the instant writ petition and accordingly seeks withdrawal of the same. Prayer is allowed. Resultantly, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant