Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/952/2022 of SATYA NATH NARAH AND 4 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 2 June 2026
GAHC010023392022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/952/2022 SATYA NATH NARAH AND 4 ORS S/O LATE TAMULI NARAH VILL- NAGAON CHUK, P.O. KARKI CHUK P.S. JENGERIMUKH DIST. MAJULI, ASSAM 2: DIPANKAR BORUAH S/O LATE SOMNATH
GAHC010023392022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/952/2022
SATYA NATH NARAH AND 4 ORS
S/O LATE TAMULI NARAH
VILL- NAGAON CHUK, P.O. KARKI CHUK
P.S. JENGERIMUKH
DIST. MAJULI, ASSAM
2: DIPANKAR BORUAH
S/O LATE SOMNATH BORUAH
VILL- POHARDIA
P.O. BHURAMARA
DIST. MAJULI
ASSAM
3: KAPIL BASUMATARY
S/O SRI RATAN BASUMATARY
VILL- KORAIBARI
P.O. DALAKATI
P.S. ROWTA
DIST. UDALGURI
ASSAM
PIN-784514
4: MOZNUR ISLAM
S/O ABDUL JALIL
VILL- 1 NO. KEHUTOLI
P.O. DHARMAPUR
P.S. LALUK
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
5: HEMA BORAH
S/O NOGEN BORAH
VILL- MERAGURIA JOYPUR
P.O. AND P.S. LALUK
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, VETERINARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, DIST. KAMRUP
(M), ASSAM
2:THE DIRECTOR
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT
ASSAM
CHENIKUTHI
GUWAHATI-781003.
3:THE PRINCIPAL
SCHOOL OF VETERINARY SCIENCE AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AT
GHUNGOOR
SILCHAR
ASSAM
PIN-78801
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HASAN, MS. S KAKATI,MR. I K BURAGOHAIN,MR. A
HASAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, M KATAKY,MR K KASHYAB (r-2),MR. B CHETRI
(r-2)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 03.06.2026 None appears for the parties on call. It appears that on 19.03.2025 as well, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant