Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/952/2022 of SATYA NATH NARAH AND 4 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 2 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010023392022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/952/2022 SATYA NATH NARAH AND 4 ORS S/O LATE TAMULI NARAH VILL- NAGAON CHUK, P.O. KARKI CHUK P.S. JENGERIMUKH DIST. MAJULI, ASSAM 2: DIPANKAR BORUAH S/O LATE SOMNATH

GAHC010023392022

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/952/2022

SATYA NATH NARAH AND 4 ORS

S/O LATE TAMULI NARAH

VILL- NAGAON CHUK, P.O. KARKI CHUK

P.S. JENGERIMUKH

DIST. MAJULI, ASSAM

2: DIPANKAR BORUAH

S/O LATE SOMNATH BORUAH

VILL- POHARDIA

P.O. BHURAMARA

DIST. MAJULI

ASSAM

3: KAPIL BASUMATARY

S/O SRI RATAN BASUMATARY

VILL- KORAIBARI

P.O. DALAKATI

P.S. ROWTA

DIST. UDALGURI

ASSAM

PIN-784514

4: MOZNUR ISLAM

S/O ABDUL JALIL

VILL- 1 NO. KEHUTOLI

P.O. DHARMAPUR

P.S. LALUK

DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

5: HEMA BORAH

S/O NOGEN BORAH

VILL- MERAGURIA JOYPUR

P.O. AND P.S. LALUK

DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, VETERINARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, DIST. KAMRUP

(M), ASSAM

2:THE DIRECTOR

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT

ASSAM

CHENIKUTHI

GUWAHATI-781003.

3:THE PRINCIPAL

SCHOOL OF VETERINARY SCIENCE AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AT

GHUNGOOR

SILCHAR

ASSAM

PIN-78801

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HASAN, MS. S KAKATI,MR. I K BURAGOHAIN,MR. A

HASAN

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, M KATAKY,MR K KASHYAB (r-2),MR. B CHETRI

(r-2)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 03.06.2026 None appears for the parties on call. It appears that on 19.03.2025 as well, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead