Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6980/2025 of THE STATE TRANSPORT WORKERS ASSOCIATION Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS on 2 June 2026
GAHC010259912025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6980/2025 THE STATE TRANSPORT WORKERS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY SRI BIPLOV BORUAH SON OF LATE GOPAL BORUAH R.O. ISBT OFFICER QUARTER P.O. GARCHUK P.S.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010259912025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6980/2025
THE STATE TRANSPORT WORKERS ASSOCIATION
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY SRI BIPLOV BORUAH SON OF LATE
GOPAL BORUAH R.O. ISBT OFFICER QUARTER P.O. GARCHUK P.S.
GARCHUK GUWAHATI KAMRUP M
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI
3:THE ASSAM STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION
REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHAT
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M DAS, SC, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, ASSAM
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, A S T C,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.06.2026 None appeared for the petitioner on call. Heard Ms. M D Bora, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 as well as Ms. K Borpuzari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. It appears that on the last occasion, i.e., on 04.05.2026 when this matter was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Considering that today also when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on call, despite the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner being reflected in the cause list, this Court deems it appropriate to dismiss the instant writ petition for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Accordingly, the instant writ petition, stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant