Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/7465/2023 of JAPIR ALI AND 2 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 1 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010286102023 2026:GAU-AS:7639 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7465/2023 JAPIR ALI AND 2 ORS S/O- LT. MUJAMIL ALI VILL- PATHEPUR P.O. CHATAL DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788720 2: KAMAL UDDIN S/O- LT. ARKAM ALI VILL-

GAHC010286102023

2026:GAU-AS:7639

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/7465/2023

JAPIR ALI AND 2 ORS

S/O- LT. MUJAMIL ALI

VILL- PATHEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST.- KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788720

2: KAMAL UDDIN

S/O- LT. ARKAM ALI

VILL- PATHEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST.- KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788720

3: MOTAI MIA

S/O- LT. ARKAM ALI

VILL- PATHEPUR

P.O. CHATAL

DIST.- KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788720

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

KARIMGANJ

P.O. AND DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788710

3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

NILAMBAZAR REVENUE CIRCLE

P.O. NILAMBAZAR

DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ

ASSAM

PIN- 788722

------------

Advocate for : MR B SINHA

Advocate for : SC

REVENUE appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 02-06-2026 Heard Mr. H. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

2. Considering the simple nature of the prayer made in this writ petition and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage.

3. The petitioners, 3 (three) in numbers, by filing this writ petition have prayed for a simple direction to the respondent authorities to dispose of the application dated 21.03.2023, submitted by them, in respect of the land measuring 2.5 acre (7.5 Kedars) covered by Dag No.141(0)/489(n) under Mohal-Dashana, Taluk No.15623/35 of Uttam Chand, Final Khatian

No.20 of Mouza-Fathepur Pt-I, Ph-Eagarsati, in the District of Karimganj, presently Sribhumi District.

4. The petitioners, who claim to be the legal heirs of late Mujamil Ali, S/o Lt. Hobib Ali. The petitioner No. 2 and 3 are the surviving legal heir of Lt. Arkam Ali, S/o Lt. Mujamil Ali, great grandfather of Hobib Ali, resident of Vill- Fathepur, Mouza-Fathepur Pt-I, Ph-Eagarsati, Dist-Karimganj, contend that their predecessor-in-interest late Hobib Ali was in occupation and possession of the subject land measuring 2.5 acre (7.5 Kedars) covered by Dag No.141(o)/489(n) under Mohal-Dashana, Taluk No.15623/35 of Uttam Chand, Final Khatian No.20 of Mouza-Fathepur Pt-I, Ph-Eagarsati, in the erstwhile District of Cachar and then under Karimganj District and now Sribhumi District. The petitioners claim that late Hobib Ali was recorded as Rayot under Khatian No.20.

5. According to the petitioners, they inherited the subject land after the demise of their fathers and grandfathers. The petitioners applied for inclusion of their names in the Khatian; however, the respondent authorities, without considering the grievance of the petitioners regarding recording of their names, recorded the subject land as Khas land. It is the contention of the petitioners that they have right to have their names recorded in the revenue records in accordance with the provisions of the Assam State Acquisition of Zamindaries Act, 1951, which was applicable in the erstwhile District of Cachar. Therefore, they submit that their application dated 21.03.2023 may be directed to be considered and disposed of.

6. Having considered the simple nature of the prayer made by the petitioners for disposal of their application for recording their names in the revenue records in terms of the applicable provisions of law and as agreed to by the learned counsels for the respondents, Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue Department and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the petitioners to file an application before the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, within a period of 20 (twenty) days from today. On receipt of the application, the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of the application.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of, in terms above.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead