Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7465/2023 of JAPIR ALI AND 2 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS on 1 June 2026
GAHC010286102023 2026:GAU-AS:7639 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7465/2023 JAPIR ALI AND 2 ORS S/O- LT. MUJAMIL ALI VILL- PATHEPUR P.O. CHATAL DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788720 2: KAMAL UDDIN S/O- LT. ARKAM ALI VILL-
GAHC010286102023
2026:GAU-AS:7639
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7465/2023
JAPIR ALI AND 2 ORS
S/O- LT. MUJAMIL ALI
VILL- PATHEPUR
P.O. CHATAL
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788720
2: KAMAL UDDIN
S/O- LT. ARKAM ALI
VILL- PATHEPUR
P.O. CHATAL
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788720
3: MOTAI MIA
S/O- LT. ARKAM ALI
VILL- PATHEPUR
P.O. CHATAL
DIST.- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788720
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARIMGANJ
P.O. AND DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788710
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
NILAMBAZAR REVENUE CIRCLE
P.O. NILAMBAZAR
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788722
------------
Advocate for : MR B SINHA
Advocate for : SC
REVENUE appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02-06-2026 Heard Mr. H. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
2. Considering the simple nature of the prayer made in this writ petition and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage.
3. The petitioners, 3 (three) in numbers, by filing this writ petition have prayed for a simple direction to the respondent authorities to dispose of the application dated 21.03.2023, submitted by them, in respect of the land measuring 2.5 acre (7.5 Kedars) covered by Dag No.141(0)/489(n) under Mohal-Dashana, Taluk No.15623/35 of Uttam Chand, Final Khatian
No.20 of Mouza-Fathepur Pt-I, Ph-Eagarsati, in the District of Karimganj, presently Sribhumi District.
4. The petitioners, who claim to be the legal heirs of late Mujamil Ali, S/o Lt. Hobib Ali. The petitioner No. 2 and 3 are the surviving legal heir of Lt. Arkam Ali, S/o Lt. Mujamil Ali, great grandfather of Hobib Ali, resident of Vill- Fathepur, Mouza-Fathepur Pt-I, Ph-Eagarsati, Dist-Karimganj, contend that their predecessor-in-interest late Hobib Ali was in occupation and possession of the subject land measuring 2.5 acre (7.5 Kedars) covered by Dag No.141(o)/489(n) under Mohal-Dashana, Taluk No.15623/35 of Uttam Chand, Final Khatian No.20 of Mouza-Fathepur Pt-I, Ph-Eagarsati, in the erstwhile District of Cachar and then under Karimganj District and now Sribhumi District. The petitioners claim that late Hobib Ali was recorded as Rayot under Khatian No.20.
5. According to the petitioners, they inherited the subject land after the demise of their fathers and grandfathers. The petitioners applied for inclusion of their names in the Khatian; however, the respondent authorities, without considering the grievance of the petitioners regarding recording of their names, recorded the subject land as Khas land. It is the contention of the petitioners that they have right to have their names recorded in the revenue records in accordance with the provisions of the Assam State Acquisition of Zamindaries Act, 1951, which was applicable in the erstwhile District of Cachar. Therefore, they submit that their application dated 21.03.2023 may be directed to be considered and disposed of.
6. Having considered the simple nature of the prayer made by the petitioners for disposal of their application for recording their names in the revenue records in terms of the applicable provisions of law and as agreed to by the learned counsels for the respondents, Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue Department and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the petitioners to file an application before the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, within a period of 20 (twenty) days from today. On receipt of the application, the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of the application.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of, in terms above.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant