Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1747/2026 of MAHARSHI SARMA, ADVOCATE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 31 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010104392026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1747/2026 MAHARSHI SARMA, ADVOCATE TAMASKAR APARTMENTS, P.D. CHALIHA ROAD, GUWAHATI CLUB, GUWAHATI-781003. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND

GAHC010104392026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1747/2026

MAHARSHI SARMA, ADVOCATE

TAMASKAR APARTMENTS, P.D. CHALIHA ROAD, GUWAHATI CLUB, GUWAHATI-781003.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781006

2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

ASSAM

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI -781019.

3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

KAMRUP

AMINGAON

PIN-781031

ASSAM.

4:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

GUWAHATI

PIN-781019

ASSAM.

5:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

HAJO

PIN-781102 ASSAM

6:THE HEADMASTER

370 NO. KACHUARBARI L.P. SCHOOL

HAJO

KAMRUP

PIN-78110

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY, MR. M SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 01.06.2026 Heard Mr. R. Gohain, learned counsel for the applicant. This is an application filed under Order 3 Rule 4 of the CPC, 1908 seeking withdrawal of names as the advocates for the writ petitioner from the Vakaltnama in the instant writ petition. It is submitted that despite repeated seeking instructions, the writ petitioner failed to respond and therefore, the counsel for the writ petitioner having no alternate have issued notice for withdrawal of their names from the Vokalatnama of the instant writ petition which was duly received by the writ petitioner. Heard and perused the documents. Upon consideration, the prayer for withdrawal is allowed. Let the names of Mr. M.K. Choudhury (Sr. Advocate), Mr. M. Sarmah, Mr. P. Bharadwaj and Ms. A. Chodhury, learned advocates for the writ petitioner be struck off from the cause list as the counsel for the writ petitioner. The I.A. stands disposed of.

The Registry shall do the needful.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead