Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2788/2026 of JAGYESWAR NATH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 31 May 2026
GAHC010093462026 2026:GAU-AS:7561 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2788/2026 JAGYESWAR NATH S/O- LATE SABHARAM NATH, R/O- KARENG NIWAS, NARENGI, FLAT NO. 5A, BLOCK-1, P.O. NARENGI, DIST. KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN- 781026.
GAHC010093462026
2026:GAU-AS:7561
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2788/2026
JAGYESWAR NATH
S/O- LATE SABHARAM NATH, R/O- KARENG NIWAS, NARENGI, FLAT NO.
5A, BLOCK-1, P.O. NARENGI, DIST. KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN- 781026.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (CRIME)
PANBAZAR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
BASISTHA
GUWAHATI-781029.
5:THE SR. SUB-REGISTRAR
KAMRUP METRO
GUWAHATI
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H SAIKIA, MR. B BORAH,MR. K KALITA,MR K
KASHYAB,MS L HMAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 01.06.2026
Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition in view of the statutory remedy of appeal available under Regulation 147 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, before the Board from orders, original or appellate passed by a Deputy Commissioner, Settlement Officer or Survey Officer.
Prayer is allowed.
Mr. A. Bhattachrejee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, for respondent No. 1, and Mr. N. Das, learned State Counsel for respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4 & 5, are present.
Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty to the petitioner to avail aforesaid statutory remedy.
Needless to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application for condonation of delay, if any, in preferring the appeal and in the event such an application is filed, same shall be considered strictly in accordance with law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant